Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: Turing Machine computable functions apply finite string
 transformations to inputs
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2025 07:33:10 +0100
Organization: Fix this later
Lines: 35
Message-ID: <vuprr6$15sqo$3@dont-email.me>
References: <vu6lnf$39fls$2@dont-email.me> <vudkah$1ona3$1@dont-email.me>
 <vufi61$3k099$1@dont-email.me> <vugddv$b21g$2@dont-email.me>
 <0a2eeee6cb4b6a737f6391c963386745a09c8a01@i2pn2.org>
 <vugvr3$pke9$8@dont-email.me>
 <4818688e0354f32267e3a5f3c60846ae7956bed2@i2pn2.org>
 <vuj18i$2lf64$6@dont-email.me>
 <f0d3f2e87d9a4e0b0f445f60a33d529f41a4fcf7@i2pn2.org>
 <vuj55m$2lf64$10@dont-email.me> <vuj8h3$2uahf$3@dont-email.me>
 <vujfuu$35hcg$1@dont-email.me>
 <65dddfad4c862e6593392eaf27876759b1ed0e69@i2pn2.org>
 <vujlj0$3a526$1@dont-email.me> <vujln7$32om9$8@dont-email.me>
 <vujmmm$3a526$2@dont-email.me> <vujmrj$32om9$9@dont-email.me>
 <vujtcb$3gsgr$1@dont-email.me> <vuju44$3hnda$1@dont-email.me>
 <vuk47o$3qkbb$1@dont-email.me> <vuk6b6$3l184$1@dont-email.me>
 <vuls34$1bf1j$4@dont-email.me> <vun87k$2m24h$2@dont-email.me>
 <vunb06$2fjjl$5@dont-email.me> <vuo57j$3h5l9$2@dont-email.me>
 <vuo68a$3dd6e$1@dont-email.me> <vuo782$3jn5n$2@dont-email.me>
 <9c3b57c69994b0477f8ac216ce6553c5b541b8f1@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2025 08:33:11 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="a99ce2d194518084f1e3236eb6fd133d";
	logging-data="1241944"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19nmf83xPmn/6GVIWRNxfBlaiUVr58c99xhmEbOaeFzsA=="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:GcoTvN9ZrMeF7QWXkO6SA3SjHpA=
In-Reply-To: <9c3b57c69994b0477f8ac216ce6553c5b541b8f1@i2pn2.org>
Content-Language: en-GB
Bytes: 3163

On 29/04/2025 02:28, Richard Damon wrote:
> On 4/28/25 11:35 AM, olcott wrote:
>> On 4/28/2025 10:18 AM, dbush wrote:
>>> On 4/28/2025 11:01 AM, olcott wrote:

<snip>

>>> The assumption that an H exists that meets the below 
>>> requirements is false, as shown by Linz and others:
>>>
>>
>> I have just proved that those requirements are stupidly wrong
>> IT IS UTTERLY MORONIC OR DECEITFUL TO DISAGREE WITH THE X86 
>> LANGUAGE
>>
> 
> No, all you have proved is that you are a stupid liar.
> 
> You CLAIM a lot of things, but haven't actually proven anything 
> you have claimeed.

Fortunately he doesn't always have to, as it has sometimes 
already been proved.

For example, he has recently claimed that incomputable functions 
exist - "Computing the actual behavior the direct execution of 
any input is ALWAYS IMPOSSIBLE." - and so he at least accepts 
Turing's conclusion, even if he doesn't like how Turing got there.

-- 
Richard Heathfield
Email: rjh at cpax dot org dot uk
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999
Sig line 4 vacant - apply within