Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: sjack@dontemail.me (sjack) Newsgroups: comp.lang.forth Subject: Re: Locals revisited Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2025 15:01:30 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 26 Message-ID: References: <19029ff0c8e7cf53335fe62639308e7f92d10240@i2pn2.org> <4b84665e38d5a523efc2479f48338ed55d142185@i2pn2.org> Injection-Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2025 17:01:30 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="837ac521506392aec17c286aaf921899"; logging-data="609624"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/NnXfE/iKUJpBRscP5qRnj" User-Agent: tin/2.6.4-20240224 ("Banff") (Linux/6.8.0-56-generic (x86_64)) Cancel-Lock: sha1:f0vcv3GsPRUxNIuvLAZgd9k2kZo= Bytes: 1507 dxf wrote: > The question then is can HEX: DEC: be justified. While you might because > CO exists, I'm not sure I could. > Toad extension: -- BHEX ( R: -> base -- ) -- HEX Back Trek -- save BASE -- Trek: set HEX -- Back: restore BASE : BHEX PRO BASE @ >R BACK R> BASE ! TREK HEX CONT ; : foo bhex . ; 100 dup i. foo --> 64 i. . --> 100 :) -- me