Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Lawrence D'Oliveiro Newsgroups: alt.comp.os.windows-11,comp.os.linux.advocacy Subject: Re: The problem with not owning the software Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2025 22:47:56 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 25 Message-ID: References: <1r5nn2k.7m1rupwur1c6N%snipeco.2@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2025 23:47:56 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="ab784ba7ba6b36eb7fc7c3f5d05b5c3d"; logging-data="1937892"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19PnNyZEF0MNPKRKdxyAzjg" User-Agent: Pan/0.161 (Chasiv Yar; ) Cancel-Lock: sha1:f/CwflyRz4G/kGIU1DCvt1qPe5U= Bytes: 2879 On Mon, 6 Jan 2025 08:23:47 -0000 (UTC), Chris wrote: > Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: > >> On Sun, 5 Jan 2025 16:07:15 -0000 (UTC), Chris wrote: >> >>> Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: >>> >>>> That adds Linux-style package-manager functionality that is missing >>>> from macOS. Because without it, trying to install open-source >>>> software turns into a complete nightmare. >>> >>> Have been using OSS on Mac for 15+ years, including building packages >>> from source. Far, far easier than on Windows. >> >> That kind of thing doesn’t scale without a package manager, though. How >> many hundred open-source packages were you able to build and install at >> once? > > My point is that most OSS software that users need are available as > ready-to-use downloads. But you did say you were “including building packages from source”. How complex were those builds you managed? Does each download include all its dependencies?