Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp Message-ID: JNTP-Route: nemoweb.net JNTP-DataType: Article Subject: Re: The real reason of "time dilation" References: <183c98cc1fc083bf$1$1838875$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity JNTP-HashClient: MoZzOsxuNKfvh-rZdjpyq-OdfcU JNTP-ThreadID: 183c98cc1fc083bf$1$1838875$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com JNTP-Uri: https://www.nemoweb.net/?DataID=gyz-N3NSlsRQgG4EBkqV7FvefFI@jntp User-Agent: Nemo/1.0 JNTP-OriginServer: nemoweb.net Date: Mon, 05 May 25 11:55:53 +0000 Organization: Nemoweb JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/135.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Injection-Info: nemoweb.net; posting-host="44aa2eb9f43e7a4e5b00ba2a4945ed97614452c3"; logging-data="2025-05-05T11:55:53Z/9301006"; posting-account="4@nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com" JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1 JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96 From: Richard Hachel Bytes: 2751 Lines: 31 Le 05/05/2025 à 11:52, Maciej Woźniak a écrit : > No, it's not "because Nature works that > way". It's not that your idiot guru has > caught God's balls, not at all. > > As the idiot has persuaded you that time > is dilating - you've created new methods > of counting it, giving the results as > he has said. > > A genaral rule of "laws of physics": > they're not about "how nature works", > they're about "how your minds work". The problem with the criticisms and paradoxes of relativistic physics stems from the fact that things are very poorly understood and very poorly explained. If we add to that the arrogance of human beings (the physicist is a human being) which prevents them from listening to those who present new, much more interesting and elegant tables, we're in trouble. Personally, this has been going on for forty years, and I see that no one WANTS to hear how it really works. It would be good, first of all, to stop using biased terms like "time dilation." It's horribly imprecise. We should talk about time elasticity (a much more precise term that includes phases of time contraction when observers are approaching). On the other hand, it's better to talk about internal CHRONOTROPY dilation due to a change of frame of reference; but physicists would still need to understand what we're talking about, and why I use these terms. For now, their arrogance and stupidity prevent them from even discussing it. R.H.