Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: "Carlos E.R." Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design Subject: Re: energy in UK Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2025 09:56:00 +0200 Lines: 17 Message-ID: References: <1raxxub.cmm17n1cvp7lsN%liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid> <1nt9dlxe5k.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> <7taddlx9pq.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net aAJhVEoGH5IR8iBtD8+QTwtM7MlW4jKknUQL5hzzMssJYmeXb9 X-Orig-Path: Telcontar.valinor!not-for-mail Cancel-Lock: sha1:xJ43oL9WmdLyiRGkmD6veniFHjQ= sha256:bsBlXhLku4vSUMCw5fOngvAN6Zoz3j3WcJSdR7wHdbs= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Content-Language: es-ES, en-CA In-Reply-To: Bytes: 1883 On 2025-04-21 02:44, Joe Gwinn wrote: > On Sun, 20 Apr 2025 16:13:38 -0700, Don Y > wrote: >> OTOH, each time they widen a roadway, there is considerable >> cost in relocating the airborne services that travel along those >> roads. Often, very high tension, cross town feeds (which tend to >> follow major arteries) on very tall, metallic towers. > > > Buried services are about five times as expensive as aerial services. And AC suffer more losses. -- Cheers, Carlos.