Path: ...!news.misty.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: comp.arch Subject: Re: IP Date: Sat, 03 May 2025 23:04:28 -0400 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 17 Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Date: Sun, 04 May 2025 05:04:29 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f1a9de35891ed366b1fd77edb25e66db"; logging-data="1087911"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19XRu1lDgahuiQMk8Qn8h57/PtqOZ1nFR0=" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cancel-Lock: sha1:KlWZZ28saXkgODjU8MG3VxDkmSo= sha1:FlCGnB1UVIeuOGcTTbTyyJk+vBE= Bytes: 1853 > You don't have to like the terminology, but that's what is used > across the field. Sorry if it's uncomfortable, and to be honest > I don't care for it much myself, but them's the breaks. That's > what AMD calls them, so if we're discussing AMD hardware, it > makes sense to use their terminology. > > People in construction probably hate that computer people call > things "blocks" that aren't made of concrete. That comparison doesn't work, the problem with "IP" is not ambiguity, but that it's politically/ethically charged. That's why I hate it: because I disagree with the politics behind it (and hate the fact "they" managed to make "everyone" use it, without even paying attention to what it means). Stefan