Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connectionsPath: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: olcott Newsgroups: comp.theory Subject: Re: Incorrect requirements --- Computing the mapping from the input to HHH(DD) Date: Thu, 8 May 2025 18:53:46 -0500 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 66 Message-ID: References: <87msbmeo3b.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <87ecwyekg2.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Fri, 09 May 2025 01:53:46 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="b8226b0a928845ead4a9adb4b3b34c7d"; logging-data="2375858"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+KjZ9NI7Vc7es+b0dKOuhr" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:+npYWVwlEiHrhISLEJUdiGn6WxE= X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 250508-4, 5/8/2025), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <87ecwyekg2.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> Bytes: 4089 On 5/8/2025 6:45 PM, Keith Thompson wrote: > olcott writes: >> On 5/8/2025 5:26 PM, Keith Thompson wrote: > [...] >>> I am more nearly an expert on C than on the Halting Problem. >>> Watching olcott base his arguments on C *and getting C so badly >>> wrong* leads me to think that he is largely ignorant of C (which is >>> fine, most people are) and is unwilling to admit it. Watching the >>> reactions of actual experts to his mathematical arguments leads me >>> to the same conclusion about his knowledge of the relevant fields >>> of mathematics. >>> >> >> If Halt7.c is not compiled with the Microsoft >> compiler then it will not produce the required >> object file type. >> >> The rest of the system has compiled under >> Linux. I haven't tried this in a few years. > > [...] > > So you normally compile your code using the 2017 version of Microsoft > Visual Studio. > > I have no particular problem with that, but your failure to correct > a number of C errors in your code is odd. As I already proved Microsoft reported no such errors. > I've pointed out several > syntax errors and constraint violations; at least the syntax errors > would be trivial to fix (even if your compiler is lax enough to > fail to diagnose them). Richard Heathfield has pointed out code > that dereferences a null pointer. > Mike corrected Richard on this. Those are stub functions intercepted by x86utm the operating system. > You are using C, a language in which you appear to have little > apparent expertise or willingness to learn, to demonstrate claims > that, if true, would overturn ideas that have been generally accepted > for decades. Can you understand why I might decide that analyzing > your claims is not worth my time? > I learned C back when K & R was the standard. void DDD() { HHH(DDD); return; } We don't need to look at any of my code for me to totally prove my point. For example when the above DDD is correctly simulated by HHH this simulated DDD cannot possibly reach its own "return" instruction. -- Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer