Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: dbush Newsgroups: comp.theory Subject: Re: Turing Machine computable functions apply finite string transformations to inputs VERIFIED FACT Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 15:57:53 -0400 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 24 Message-ID: References: <0a2eeee6cb4b6a737f6391c963386745a09c8a01@i2pn2.org> <4818688e0354f32267e3a5f3c60846ae7956bed2@i2pn2.org> <65dddfad4c862e6593392eaf27876759b1ed0e69@i2pn2.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 21:57:52 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="36c3ab966607e6b458aa2826fcd1def6"; logging-data="1021751"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18H9CYAHH8ZC5wgWiFux1Tf" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:KuUT0uwhV2ueO0Go638gHa2VENU= In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 3059 On 4/30/2025 1:38 PM, olcott wrote: > On 4/29/2025 5:00 AM, joes wrote: >> Am Mon, 28 Apr 2025 21:50:03 -0500 schrieb olcott: >>> On 4/28/2025 3:13 PM, Richard Heathfield wrote: >> >>>> What matters is whether a TM can be constructed that can accept an >>>> arbitrary TM tape P and an arbitrary input tape D and correctly >>>> calculate whether, given D as input, P would halt. Turing proved that >>>> such a TM cannot be constructed. >>>> This is what we call the Halting Problem. >>>> >>> Yet it is H(P,D) and NOT P(D) that must be measured. Computer science >>> has been wrong about this all of these years. When I provide the 100% >>> concrete example of the x86 language there is zero vagueness to slip >>> through the cracks of understanding. > >> No, H gets P(D) as input, not itself. H is the "measurer", not being >> measured. >> > > H NEVER gets P(D) as input. > H always gets finite strings P and D as inputs. Which is stipulated to be a complete description of algorithm P with input D