Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: anthk Newsgroups: comp.misc Subject: Re: On Binary Digits Date: Mon, 12 May 2025 06:24:44 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 20 Message-ID: References: <86v7rnj0vn.fsf@example.com> <67ed69b2$0$707$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Mon, 12 May 2025 08:24:44 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="cc7a24369ce4842ffee3a5ba377d97da"; logging-data="1014028"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/H8ZD/oYq5xeTtrmgwlDEO" User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (OpenBSD) Cancel-Lock: sha1:7CGgTZK7IWqW/dnk/oGKCkpEVXM= Bytes: 1764 On 2025-04-04, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: > On 02 Apr 2025 16:45:38 GMT, Aharon Robbins wrote: > >> Octal was used heavily on the PDP-11, if you used the assembler. > > All DEC’s systems used octal heavily, prior to the VAX. That’s when they > started using hex. > > All the DEC machines prior to the PDP-11 had word lengths that were > multiples of 3 (12, 18, 36), so octal worked nicely. Even though the > PDP-11 was a 16-bit machine, fields in its instruction format were still > designed to line up with octal digits. Why? "octal" means base eight ( as 'ocho' in Spanish, same Latin root). forth>3 8 lcm . 24 Not very fitting for a 36 bit machine except for opcodes.