Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!panix!.POSTED.spitfire.i.gajendra.net!not-for-mail
From: cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross)
Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: The joy of FORTRAN
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2025 12:25:51 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC
Message-ID: <vq6rgf$fi5$1@reader1.panix.com>
References: <5mqdnZuGq4lgwm_7nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@earthlink.com> <vq52ov$1f9re$3@dont-email.me> <vq55if$7ae$1@reader1.panix.com> <vq6g9q$1q495$6@dont-email.me>
Injection-Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2025 12:25:51 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader1.panix.com; posting-host="spitfire.i.gajendra.net:166.84.136.80";
	logging-data="15941"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@panix.com"
X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
Originator: cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross)
Bytes: 1360
Lines: 13

In article <vq6g9q$1q495$6@dont-email.me>,
The Natural Philosopher  <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>On 03/03/2025 21:05, Dan Cross wrote:
>> If you're passing sixty plus variables to a function, then line
>> length limits are the least of your problems.
> 
>Not if you are injecting a set of 60 variables into a database, or a CSV 
>file.

There are other ways of doing that that do not involve passing
60 parameters into a single function call.

	- Dan C.