Path: ...!news.roellig-ltd.de!open-news-network.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: "Carlos E. R." Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.advocacy Subject: Re: Anybody Using IPv6? Date: Tue, 20 May 2025 11:55:04 +0200 Lines: 25 Message-ID: References: <100c243$c9t$1@reader1.panix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net tIhyhmRTLWxwzSzhoEZiOAlKKlGeGPUJ+pPsVUWn2oXeF13viz Cancel-Lock: sha1:jAkNWzKpDJkbjoKj0ayPd4PB1rU= sha256:KxNjqNBXVO2iKgEG4kgfa/agTljlr8aWAh6IwNbK8z0= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Content-Language: en-CA, es-ANY In-Reply-To: Bytes: 1789 On 2025-05-20 06:17, c186282 wrote: > On 5/18/25 3:26 AM, Popping Mad wrote: >> On 5/17/25 2:01 PM, vallor wrote: >>> IPv6 is the future. >> >> >> fuck ip6 > >   We WILL need it, or something LIKE it, eventually >   IOT, most of the world signing up ... IPV4 is NOT >   gonna be enough. > >   But for NOW ... yea ... I disable IPV6. My ISP >   doesn't even do it, so why suffer the probs ? Because we don't have IPv6 we are having to run hacks. Like placing a camera inside home, and in order to see the images on the phone you have to use a server outside, probably in China, as intermediary. With IPv6 you can connect directly to the camera with complete privacy (and compliant software). -- Cheers, Carlos E.R.