Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Tim Rentsch Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: Loops (was Re: do { quit; } else { }) Date: Sun, 04 May 2025 21:35:16 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 29 Message-ID: <86plgn65ff.fsf@linuxsc.com> References: <20250413072027.219@kylheku.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Injection-Date: Mon, 05 May 2025 06:35:17 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="b2f20e442295d938e3644788cf940be7"; logging-data="3880418"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+LJ9mUBAQiTXJGSC8aoPBRVHCunBgxcVI=" User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.4 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:bxX6S5FTJBeXbvhQwRT0HZUKJGc= sha1:0V+mfa1aXXUlkkZ3LXHNwskoH/Q= Bytes: 2478 scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) writes: > bart writes: > >> On 18/04/2025 19:10, James Kuyper wrote: >> >>> On 16.04.2025 13:01, bart wrote: >>> ... >>> >>>> Unlike C's for, which is just a gimmick where you bundle three >>>> potentially unrelated expressions and hope for the best. >>> >>> If all you can do is "hope for the best", you're doing it wrong. >>> It's your job to ensure that they are not arbitrary unrelated >>> expressions, but correctly related expressions, and that's no >>> different from your responsibility for all of the other >>> expressions that make up your program. >> >> If you find that problematic, you shouldn't be programming in >> >>> any language, but certainly not in C. >> >> I see it didn't take you long to get to the personal insult. What >> is it with this group? > > It's not an insult, it is a simple fact. Any statement with the word "should" in it is a lot more likely to be a statement of opinion than a statement of fact.