Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Paul.B.Andersen" Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: Newton: Photon falling from h meters increase its energy. Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2025 20:29:51 +0100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 38 Message-ID: References: <4af374770bb67b6951ef19c75b35fbad@www.novabbs.com> <1819b35cb5854fb7$83258$1308629$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> <17a125a3e75f42ff91ef08afdab4e0a9@www.novabbs.com> <1819b79e1aa58c97$89507$1329657$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <9e55d347a16ad439d5b2e75440ae1a6d@www.novabbs.com> <6782d853$0$28064$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <4404fd8d88a2eacd658d92efeef4d6c2@www.novabbs.com> <7db98cab57f6050f8daf2f88b9bfdcdb@www.novabbs.com> <4568ec448c26221aea0c57a6bfc7b29b@www.novabbs.com> <735acd1678938a0da82e207ed024d0fc@www.novabbs.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2025 20:27:29 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="bf8e28b53792659a824bb3337f9010e5"; logging-data="3822815"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX189MoDETIIIKb/Q31QoZY0G" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:YyVsw25tl6nfgKkrW/pK8B1dM4I= Content-Language: en-GB In-Reply-To: <735acd1678938a0da82e207ed024d0fc@www.novabbs.com> Bytes: 2929 Den 15.01.2025 18:46, skrev LaurenceClarkCrossen: > On Wed, 15 Jan 2025 13:00:31 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote: >> >> GR's prediction for the gravitational deflection >> is confirmed by a number of experiments: >> >> https://paulba.no/paper/PPN_gamma_Hipparcos.pdf >> https://paulba.no/paper/PPN_gamma_Cassini.pdf >> https://paulba.no/paper/Shapiro_2004.pdf >> https://paulba.no/paper/Fomalont.pdf >> https://paulba.no/paper/PPN_gamma_Cassini_2.pdf >> >> You know, experimental evidence _is_ the reality. >> Your opinion is fantasy. > Your opinion and that of the majority and the authorities are irrelevant > fantasies. Quite. Anybody's fantasies are irrelevant. But the experimental evidence is reality, not fantasy. GR's predictions for the gravitational deflection of EM-radiation are so thoroughly experimentally confirmed that you have to be extremely ignorant not to accept it. > You fail to address Poor's refutation of the derivation. If > you want to do that, you would need to bring up Trumpler, as I have done > by mentioning his paper. How is it possible to fail to understand that experimental evidence has proven Poor wrong? -- Paul https://paulba.no/