Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Lawrence D'Oliveiro Newsgroups: comp.arch Subject: Re: The Seymour Cray Era of Supercomputers Date: Mon, 19 May 2025 01:56:50 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 9 Message-ID: <100e352$1d61i$3@dont-email.me> References: <100apst$hsll$1@dont-email.me> <100bs7t$rna2$1@dont-email.me> <20250518182303.00003542@yahoo.com> <76948d869e78f8cb511809bd159008fd@www.novabbs.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Mon, 19 May 2025 03:56:50 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="d08b868199288c9a41a975c5a67c7108"; logging-data="1480754"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18fLv3BkGnGkMYSe2LjQa/C" User-Agent: Pan/0.162 (Pokrosvk) Cancel-Lock: sha1:ualG7G2QuiFg0wF3wx94Try87uU= Bytes: 1527 On Mon, 19 May 2025 01:08:11 +0000, quadibloc wrote: > Yes, but the CDC 6600 and 7600, while powerful computers, were ordinary > computers. They were not vector machines. They were pipelined machines. They were orders of magnitude faster than anything from IBM. They pioneered the very concept of a “supercomputer”. There was nothing “ordinary” about that.