Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Jim Pennino Newsgroups: sci.physics Subject: Re: The Orange One Date: Sat, 24 May 2025 19:54:19 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 100 Message-ID: References:

<224e57ec1c05fa362dcffb940726ebd7@www.novabbs.org>

<42988bbb04d800c72420afefedeae0b1@www.novabbs.org> <47e90688fd24647ba4157601dddf1ccc@www.novabbs.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sun, 25 May 2025 05:01:06 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="28a4b46c632fd0520e7a7e2b728d13ef"; logging-data="1249297"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX180kwuXyULfv1/YNfb+Rp3H" User-Agent: tin/2.6.2-20220130 ("Convalmore") (Linux/5.15.0-140-lowlatency (x86_64)) Cancel-Lock: sha1:W4j1DQr46NrTkjR5HTNyXGgz4Xo= Bytes: 5318 Bertitaylor wrote: > On Sat, 24 May 2025 22:43:37 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote: > >> Bertitaylor wrote: >>> On Sat, 24 May 2025 22:13:10 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote: >>> >>>> In sci.physics Bertitaylor wrote: >>>>> On Sat, 24 May 2025 14:47:19 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> In sci.physics Bertitaylor wrote: >>>>>>> On Sat, 24 May 2025 13:25:40 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> In sci.physics Bertitaylor wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Fri, 23 May 2025 13:24:06 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> In sci.physics Bertitaylor wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 22 May 2025 13:54:24 +0000, occam wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 22/05/2025 02:00, Arindam's bitches wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The Israelis and Indians evidently know what to do about crude missile >>>>>>>>>>>>> attacks. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Short range missiles. You detect, you shoot. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> The discussion so far has been on long range missiles. Not the same >>>>>>>>>>>> thing. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Arindam's new design rail gun can launch missiles at supersonic speeds. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> You have reproduced something invented almost 200 years ago and your >>>>>>>>>> version is capable of nothing more than rolling pipes at low speed, >>>>>>>>>> crackpot. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> No, not so, Pennino. Don't lie. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> No one invented the low voltage heavy armature electromagnetic rail gun >>>>>>>>> design before Arindam Banerjee, who did it in 2015 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The basic principal can be traced back to the work of Charles Wheatstone >>>>>>>> in the 1840's, crackpot. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Using the principal to launch a projectile was demonstrated by André >>>>>>>> Louis Octave Fauchon-Villeplée in 1917, crackpot. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> We are not talking old stuff here, dodgy liar. Totally irrelevant to >>>>>>> Arindam's astounding work that is completely original. No one ever did >>>>>>> such an experiment that by outing inertia revised the foundations of >>>>>>> dynamics. >>>>>> >>>>>> Making a device that is bigger, smaller or slightly different is not an >>>>>> invention, Arindam. >>>>> >>>>> It is not slightly different, stupid lying penisnino. It is vastly >>>>> different, >>>> >>>> No, it is no different in principle than models built over a hundred >>>> years ago, crackpot. Using modern, synthetic insulated wire instead of >>>> cloth insulated wire doesn't make it different, crackpot. >>> >>> Arindam used super capacitors for his experiment which were not around a >>> century ago, fool. >> >> The only difference between super capacitors and what was available 100 >> years ago is the size of the capacitors for a given capacitance, >> crackpot. >> >> All of which is irrelevant as electricity is electricity no matter the >> source, crackpot. > > Current amplitude and physical size matter, fool. The maximum voltage rating for super capacitors is under 3 volts. To get large currents, you need high voltages. A super capacitor is probably the WORST thing you could pick to power a rail gun, crackpot, which is why your "rail gun" does nothing more than roll a pipe very slowly. >> >> By the way, crackpot, Fauchon-Villeplée patented his device (US1421435A) >> in 1919. > > Fat lot of anything that did for the failed US rail guns. Whether or not anyone has ever made a practical rail gun is irrelevant, crackpot. The bottom line is the 1919 patent shows a device of identical construction to your pipe roller and there is nothing new in your construction, crackpot. -- penninojim@yahoo.com