Path: ...!news.misty.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: WM Newsgroups: sci.math Subject: Re: The set of necessary FISONs Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2025 17:59:28 +0100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 35 Message-ID: References: <4ae7b6d4-49a9-47ba-b2ac-c77238e93545@att.net> <60614d74-cf15-4e8e-8390-f8861bff44f9@att.net> <76d99693-1dcf-4049-98b9-a33edced2e83@att.net> <123fb080-4f72-482c-a6e9-aa525aa7150b@att.net> <00fb52fc-ca18-4166-90c7-71b5a66e2dda@att.net> <682d08268062949c28daa5e48fd4823c1b1af4fd@i2pn2.org> <81fb12a8d891994f7dff3df3a5f2a86565212c68@i2pn2.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2025 17:59:30 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="e7473ca36dc84ec9f66b2225a91dbba2"; logging-data="2191483"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/CTNqKd08CX5KkOWN5fsGjyLO92AB1LPA=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:E7vZGtPSn6HVblfnL1NMDFn/Ga8= In-Reply-To: <81fb12a8d891994f7dff3df3a5f2a86565212c68@i2pn2.org> Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 3399 On 11.03.2025 12:00, joes wrote: > Am Mon, 10 Mar 2025 16:20:58 +0100 schrieb WM: >> On 10.03.2025 09:30, joes wrote: >>> Am Sun, 09 Mar 2025 20:13:53 +0100 schrieb WM: >> >>>> I am interested in the difference that you see between >>>> Z₀ defined by { } ∈ Z₀, and if {{{...{{{ }}}...}}} with n curly >>>> brackets ∈ Z₀ then {{{...{{{ }}}...}}} with n+1 curly brackets ∈ Z₀ >>>> and >>>> The set of FISONs failing to have the union ℕ defied by induction: >>>> |ℕ \ {1}| = ℵo, and if |ℕ \ {1, 2, 3, ..., n}| = ℵo then |ℕ \ {1, 2, >>>> 3, ..., n+1}| = ℵo. >>> >>> How you can view the first set not to have the same union (by Neumann's >>> equivalence) as the the second one would be most welcome. In any case, >>> the second set does not exist according to your contradictory specifi- >>> cation. They are clearly isomorphic. >> >> That is no my opinion but Jim Burns' opinion. >> Both sets are identical. Both are potentially infinite collections. > No, they are not finite. They are no finite. > You can't believe Z_0 to be "complete" in > your sense if you don't think the second set is (and accept that they > are equivalent). They are minutely equivalent. To described both take ℕ. Delete 1. If you have deleted n, delete n+1. In all steps ℵ₀ numbers remain. Regards, WM