Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Lawrence D'Oliveiro Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: "A diagram of C23 basic types" Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2025 22:56:51 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 14 Message-ID: References: <87y0wjaysg.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2025 00:56:51 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="106e88ba52bf91129f74dfc3c9756b79"; logging-data="783570"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19NzDztruNlK0of7QcWpgfO" User-Agent: Pan/0.162 (Pokrosvk) Cancel-Lock: sha1:faDkKrFEaUh/THONPaPJnEt0660= Bytes: 2043 On Tue, 15 Apr 2025 00:40:48 -0500, BGB wrote: > Practically, picoseconds are likely the smallest unit of time that > people could practically measure or hope to make much use of. “10¯¹² seconds ought to be enough for anybody.” The lessons of software backward-compatibility baggage teach us that we need to think a bit beyond present-day technological limitations. > Planck units are so small as to be essentially useless for any > practical measurement. And as far as we know, that will always be true.