Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Arden Vassilopulos Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.math Subject: Re: [ANN] SR/InertialFrames v2.2.1 Followup-To: sci.physics.relativity,sci.math Date: Sun, 25 May 2025 14:57:39 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 24 Message-ID: <100vb53$1di4f$3@dont-email.me> References: <100keh4$2a7u2$1@dont-email.me> <100so6h$l8lc$1@dont-email.me> <100utao$1at36$1@dont-email.me> <1842cb27cf39f5c1$16240$1819595$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <100v9pq$1di4f$2@dont-email.me> <1842ccbeef873d30$20502$1799812$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sun, 25 May 2025 16:57:40 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="221f63b6e12570fe370de555cb3d9664"; logging-data="1493135"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19dfOyvSctQ0mYT4BieSqtB" User-Agent: Rocksolid Light Cancel-Lock: sha1:Igw/ERoXG+zU/DYYFtUU8rtxO4Q= X-Face: $"eO7q^g,@mN0klG2J]sV"NMbeVMf2'-;P*@(~`UkK_cA{lP/ixtb>t!n{xTQK<7 PC})}3=9!ps)Wq/=wI'swo3![y6wN5"I`{Z7Jr`virT"6}OZN|Jn.q9`Drs(r8rOxq#ZCW' ,>|wg%J=BZ>}cm>>9'v>&)\!06qQ]dy5b;&V8u0UdmE]g-AL{a$50'0Z\|:Q,:xMB0$U';.lO C'e=%Lr/$6ZRDV On 5/25/2025 4:34 PM, Delman Vamvakidis wrote: >> Maciej Woźniak wrote: >> >>> On 5/25/2025 1:08 PM, Paul.B.Andersen wrote: >>>> Den 24.05.2025 17:21, skrev Julio Di Egidio: >>>>> which, apparently.  That said, thanks for asking: >>>>> >>>>> The "clock hypothesis", in simple terms, is the principle that all >>>>> working clocks tick at the same rate (the proper time rate) in their >>>>> own frame. >>> >>> Anyone can check GPs, in the real world the rate of Cs clocks is >>> either 9 192 631 770 or 9 192 631 774. Not even talking about pendulum >>> clocks. >>> Good bye, "clock hypothesis", >>> good bye The Shit of Einstein. >> >> my friend, pendulum clocks are NOT clocks, but altitude_meters. > > I'm not your friend and pendulum clocks are clocks. ... since you insist