Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: JAB <here@is.invalid>
Newsgroups: misc.news.internet.discuss
Subject: Re: Shouldn't have threatened their sovereignty.
Date: Fri, 23 May 2025 22:49:01 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <100rfjf$gut6$1@dont-email.me>
References: <100q960$62a4$1@dont-email.me> <100qodl$8pb1$2@dont-email.me>
Reply-To: JAB <here@is.invalid>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 24 May 2025 05:49:04 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="e9ae5450cd9824e342b851b660b87352";
	logging-data="555942"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19dzFfcTel0FQdn5l7RE6O0"
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
Cancel-Lock: sha1:rDwTxqZNE/+Tyo21huTaUbe334Y=
Bytes: 1559

On Fri, 23 May 2025 17:13:22 -0400, Auric Hellman
<adhellman1@gmail.com> wrote:

>What reason could Canada have for not
>wanting protection under a Golden Dome?

I would not think Canada is a target of interest.

"Shashank Joshi, defence editor at the Economist, said while the US
military would take the plan very seriously, it was unrealistic to
think the system would be completed during Trump's term, and that its
cost would take up a large part of the defense budget"

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_Dome_(missile_defense_system)>