Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: olcott Newsgroups: comp.theory Subject: Re: What it would take... People to address my points with reasoning instead of rhetoric -- RP Date: Wed, 14 May 2025 13:59:19 -0500 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 46 Message-ID: <1002p67$2l877$1@dont-email.me> References: <1000ce4$21dtc$3@dont-email.me> <1000q52$24gr3$2@dont-email.me> <1000qss$24jh0$2@dont-email.me> <1000rfv$24gr3$6@dont-email.me> <1000s0e$24sr2$1@dont-email.me> <1000s6d$24gr3$8@dont-email.me> <1000t1a$24sr2$4@dont-email.me> <1000t8e$24gr3$11@dont-email.me> <1000vs5$29e7u$1@dont-email.me> <100101g$24gr3$14@dont-email.me> <10011b6$29e7u$4@dont-email.me> <10012le$24gr3$17@dont-email.me> <1001370$2a1j4$1@dont-email.me> <100172f$2ao7o$1@dont-email.me> <10017lb$2aojt$1@dont-email.me> <100184e$2asas$1@dont-email.me> <10018ij$2aut2$1@dont-email.me> <100197l$2asas$2@dont-email.me> <1002ev3$2i4bk$20@dont-email.me> <1002fk4$2j9i8$1@dont-email.me> <1002h7l$2jlcp$1@dont-email.me> <1002j46$2k04b$2@dont-email.me> <1002jgi$2k00a$2@dont-email.me> <1002kl4$2k04c$2@dont-email.me> <1002kui$2kb74$2@dont-email.me> <1002ljq$2k04b$4@dont-email.me> <1002mpa$2kb74$4@dont-email.me> <1002obs$2k04b$6@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Wed, 14 May 2025 20:59:20 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="1b4c815c0318038d25de37dcdc1ad225"; logging-data="2793703"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/UfZhHYqBMUJqwk4irTt67" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:Sa0YUDVUYbXpO1mdKPS57AIqhuI= X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 250514-4, 5/14/2025), Outbound message Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <1002obs$2k04b$6@dont-email.me> X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Bytes: 3800 On 5/14/2025 1:45 PM, Richard Heathfield wrote: > On 14/05/2025 19:18, olcott wrote: >> On 5/14/2025 12:58 PM, Richard Heathfield wrote: >>> On 14/05/2025 18:46, olcott wrote: > > > >>>> PAY ATTENTION !!! >>> >>> Oh, my dear dear chap - if I thought for a moment you had anything >>> worth paying attention to, I'd be all ears. >>> >>> But you have nothing but mindless repetition, over and over and OVER. >>> For every article you post, I can pretty much guarantee that I've >>> read 90% of it before. >>> >> >> I repeat the steps that prove my point until >> someone actually pays attention to these points >> that prove I am correct. > > And how is that strategy panning out for you? > > The more you repeat, the less attention you get. All you get is copy- > paste rebuttals of your copy-paste claims. > THERE NEVER HAS BEEN ANY ACTUAL REBUTTAL OF ANY OF MY ACTUAL CLAIMS. There has been rhetoric that stupid people could mistake as rebuttal. If simulating halt decider H correctly simulates its input D until H correctly determines that its simulated D would never stop running unless aborted then For example every single attempt at showing how HHH/DDD does not meet the exact meaning of words of the above specification ALWAYS CHANGES THE WORDS IN THIS SPECIFICATION AND THEN REBUTS THOSE CHANGED WORDS. This may get some people condemned to actual Hell. -- Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer