Path: ...!news.misty.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: minforth@gmx.net (minforth) Newsgroups: comp.lang.forth Subject: Re: Lispification of Forth Date: Tue, 27 May 2025 20:23:02 +0000 Organization: novaBBS Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="2187371"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="BZ29EnRIXfdX99fE+pfHgueF2xuF1KvSpLJsfuOZy3Y"; User-Agent: Rocksolid Light X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$bn1/U29.iJ8tgc6VDRQnm.NbpWLyrojE1kXvGUXpCZ1EyrywsmBp. X-Rslight-Posting-User: 0338a3da6f3e9c9f1401b365bcd9c3ed8de2227a Bytes: 1247 Lines: 7 It might be less complicated to use tokens or hashes instead of memory addresses in high-level Forth code. All dictionaries, data or VM code sequences could then be localised exclusively via a central token table or hash table. Replacing/modifying a word would be very simple by patching the token/hash table. --