Path: ...!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Wave particle duality has been disproven for photons also.
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2025 08:58:33 +0200
Lines: 28
Message-ID: <maa911Fi1o0U6@mid.individual.net>
References: <bee82c477b86c0caf1c30da405ed870f@www.novabbs.com>
 <10140pm$2huu3$1@dont-email.me>
 <211597acf09cc21af2125ea3c9fe12d4@www.novabbs.com>
 <101acbb$188t$1@dont-email.me>
 <a18977a79cf92b54c28e3e65395ab113@www.novabbs.com>
 <101cpl6$isnr$1@dont-email.me>
 <1844830cac6ece08$164805$1966588$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com>
 <844a0d83caeacd8dae32487821889fb8@www.novabbs.com>
 <goH_P.892794$BFJ.19100@fx13.ams4>
 <1844b1dd9110820c$262985$1819595$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com>
 <fd67be5bdeeb7f9a15ebd084a809f800@www.novabbs.com>
 <101h830$1vsbc$1@dont-email.me> <ma5vu0Fs71pU5@mid.individual.net>
 <1rdbi5h.7xmmns1niw3yvN%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl>
 <ma7kgjF5rumU3@mid.individual.net>
 <1rdcs2x.6n9vul1nvf9nkN%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl>
 <101nc9m$5rdd$1@dont-email.me>
 <1rdde9b.1wc79mc16ocggwN%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net xw1CIL0QC/0U/K+izYAJ1QLOYWrvP97t1HGkVozE8dqKR6/vl6
Cancel-Lock: sha1:WLO0VwDHY4Mx+YwBKzg6AAlWT8A= sha256:4rE/dS2XaJOFquaox6yFDncL4UdsHlWgGUZu6pfB+dg=
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: de-DE, en-US
In-Reply-To: <1rdde9b.1wc79mc16ocggwN%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl>
Bytes: 2704

Am Dienstag000003, 03.06.2025 um 21:22 schrieb J. J. Lodder:

>>>>
>>>> I have looked at that paper very carefully and wrote about 428 comments
>>>> about statements, which were in many cases wrong.
>>>
>>> Ah, some insight into yourself.
>>
>> Alas, probably not. Thomas Heger has never understood the way commas
>> are used in English and how it differs from how they are used in
>> German. So although he is saying (probably correctly) that most of his
>> 428 comments are wrong, he probably thinks he was saying that many of
>> Einstein's statements were wrong, which is just his fantasy.
> 
> I fear that our educational efforts are wasted on him.
> And I am beginning to think that TH may be incompetent
> in the subtleties of the German language as well.
> Einstein's use of the language is often subtle and highly idiomatic,
> 
I can assure you, that I speak German much better than English.

Einsteins German, on the other hand, was quite weak.

This is quite astonishing, because usually intelligent people have also 
the ability to master their own language.

TH