Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Cryptoengineer Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written Subject: Re: Pearls Before Swine: Uncle Is Not Good With Money Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2025 16:07:55 -0500 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 39 Message-ID: References: <3lXhP.796222$DYF8.49743@fx14.iad> <_JxiP.459303$FOb4.13389@fx15.iad> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2025 22:07:56 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="92819601e2627ed72b239a438b0f6f50"; logging-data="248828"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+aihDtjgYoF/bqqHiuw9g1aBH1orZINsI=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:r0Lwd3/oPGwotqY2A7t6r1Bo2Og= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <_JxiP.459303$FOb4.13389@fx15.iad> On 1/17/2025 1:56 PM, Scott Lurndal wrote: > Paul S Person writes: >> On Thu, 16 Jan 2025 12:46:59 -0500, Cryptoengineer >> wrote: >> >> >> >>> Not his whole life, but I heartily recommend the 1970 "Waterloo" >>> starting Christopher Plummer, Rod Steiger and Orson Wells. >>> >>> I've seen analysis by historians to the effect that this is the >>> most historically accurate version of the battle ever filmed. >> >> Being by Bondarchuck, I would think so.=20 >> >>> The battle was filmed in Ukraine. The Soviet Army lent the >>> production 17,000 soldiers, who were trained to drill and >>> 'fight' in period style and uniforms. This was before CGI and >>> Maya, and if you see a soldier, he's real. This led to a >>> minor degree of randomness that underscores the reality of the >>> scene, details such random glints of sunlight off the bayonets >>> of a formation half a mile away. >>> >>> This was by far the largest number of extras ever used in one >>> movie, and was said to be the 'seventh largest army in Europe'. >> >> Actually, has it >> at 9th largest. The largest number is 300,000 for /Gandhi/. > > _Waterloo_ may well have had the largest number of > extras _at the time it was made_ (1970). Ghandi was a > decade later. Not according to the article Paul linked. It lists several movies that both pre-date it, and had more extras. Regardless, the movie is very good. pt