Path: ...!news.nobody.at!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!newsfeed.xs3.de!nntp-feed.chiark.greenend.org.uk!ewrotcd!news.eyrie.org!beagle.ediacara.org!.POSTED.beagle.ediacara.org!not-for-mail From: jillery <69jpil69@gmail.com> Newsgroups: talk.origins Subject: Re: Texas given up on the switch scam? Date: Fri, 30 May 2025 16:59:26 -0400 Organization: What are you looking for? Lines: 86 Sender: to%beagle.ediacara.org Approved: moderator@beagle.ediacara.org Message-ID: <617k3k51j03eq5s01e3h008rnv0h6tih9m@4ax.com> References: <1011rbv$21a5j$1@dont-email.me> <1019jmj$3s0qp$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: beagle.ediacara.org; posting-host="beagle.ediacara.org:3.132.105.89"; logging-data="38174"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@beagle.ediacara.org" User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272 To: talk-origins@moderators.isc.org Return-Path: X-Original-To: talk-origins@ediacara.org Delivered-To: talk-origins@ediacara.org id AF9BD22978C; Fri, 30 May 2025 16:59:33 -0400 (EDT) by beagle.ediacara.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8973B229783 for ; Fri, 30 May 2025 16:59:31 -0400 (EDT) id 7EDF31C0918; Fri, 30 May 2025 20:59:30 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: talk-origins@moderators.isc.org by newsfeed.bofh.team (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 65F551C05CA for ; Fri, 30 May 2025 20:59:30 +0000 (UTC) by nntpmail01.iad.omicronmedia.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B53D7E0F68 for ; Fri, 30 May 2025 20:59:28 +0000 (UTC) id 7DAE0A401C7; Fri, 30 May 2025 20:59:28 +0000 (UTC) X-Path: fx15.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail X-Original-Complaints-To: abuse(at)newshosting.com X-NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 30 May 2025 20:59:27 UTC Bytes: 5203 On Thu, 29 May 2025 13:24:51 +0100, Ernest Major <{$to$}@meden.demon.co.uk> wrote: >On 28/05/2025 11:17, jillery wrote: >> On Wed, 28 May 2025 09:44:32 +0100, Martin Harran >> wrote: >>=20 >>> On Mon, 26 May 2025 08:46:37 -0500, RonO >>> wrote: >>> >>>> = https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/texas-bill-ten-commandment= s-public-schools-rcna206851 >>>> >>>> Texas had bent over for the obfuscation and denial creationist = switch >>>> scam back in 2010, but had to have the bait and switch run on them = again >>>> in 2013 when they tried to use the switch scam to teach ID in their >>>> public schools. >>>> >>>> They are now trying a more direct approach that seems to be as >>>> unconstitutional as Oklahoma's use of the Bible in public schools as= a >>>> text book, and last month Arkansas' Trumpy Governor (she claims that >>>> Trump was chosen by Jesus) signed similar 10 commandment legislation >>>> when I was out on the road. >>> >>> [...] >>> >>> America Magazine, published by the Jesuits, had an article yesterday >>> analysing how it is wrong for the Christian Right to be campaigning >>> for posting the Ten Commandments in schools. >>> >>> I give a link to the full article below but here is the TLDR version >>>from their newsletter yesterday: >>> >>> >>> Father Clifford, a Jesuit priest who taught for 55 years at Boston >>> College and is a professor emeritus of Old Testament there, notes a >>> consensus among biblical scholars from the Jewish, Catholic and >>> Protestant traditions that while the Ten Commandments lay the >>> foundation for Jews' and Christians' relationship with God, they are >>> not meant to be a universal covenant that applies to adherents of >>> other religions-or of no religion. Posting the Ten Commandments in = the >>> classroom, then, is not just a violation of the First Amendment, but >>> also a contradiction of the Bible itself. >>> >>> >>> What might be a more appropriate text? "Let me offer an alternative >>> for American classrooms: the Golden Rule, treating others as one = would >>> want to be treated by them," Father Clifford writes. "A version of = the >>> Golden Rule is found in several places in the Bible and in almost >>> every religion in the world." >>> >>> >>> >>> Full article: >>> = https://www.americamagazine.org/faith/2025/05/27/clifford-ten-commandment= s-classrooms-250734 >>=20 >>=20 >> "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you". >>=20 >> A better version is: >>=20 >> "Do unto others as others would have you do unto them". >>=20 >> It's a subtle distinction. But based on your posting behavior, the >> subtleties of both versions escape you. >>=20 > >The second version avoids at least some of the failure modes of the=20 >first, but it has its own failure modes. Consider the case where the=20 >other person is a narcissist or a sociopath. What is the point of the Golden Rule? How does doing what a narcissist or sociopath wants you to do to them violate that point? --=20 To know less than we don't know is the nature of most knowledge