Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connectionsPath: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Michael S Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: do { quit; } else { } Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2025 19:03:21 +0300 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 37 Message-ID: <20250406190321.000001dc@yahoo.com> References: <8634enhcui.fsf@linuxsc.com> <86ldsdfocs.fsf@linuxsc.com> <20250406161323.00005809@yahoo.com> <86ecy5fjin.fsf@linuxsc.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2025 18:03:23 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="58f7fc265c99eb47e3d5fcc28f6142ae"; logging-data="684893"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+oQaU+jFZMX9YMaJbhPWLTRxCmvtg2Lpc=" Cancel-Lock: sha1:1ay8GiVKyCvV31aCvAXCpO38epg= X-Newsreader: Claws Mail 3.19.1 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-w64-mingw32) On Sun, 06 Apr 2025 07:32:16 -0700 Tim Rentsch wrote: > Michael S writes: > > > On Sun, 06 Apr 2025 05:47:47 -0700 > > Tim Rentsch wrote: > > > >> > >> Furthermore, even if there had been a posting that concerns > >> only a gcc extension and nothing else, and is one I didn't > >> respond to, that doesn't excuse your action. It isn't like > >> this is the first time you have posted something here that > >> is not about C but only about your fantasy language, and > >> also not the first time the unsuitability of such postings > >> has been pointed out. You're a repeat offender. So stop > >> pretending you are being picked on for no reason. > > > > Could you recommend a more appropriate place for Thiago and others > > where they can discuss C-like fantasy languages? > > The newsgroup comp.lang.misc seems like a natural candidate. > I don't know if comp.lang.misc has an official charter, but at > least to me new features of any widely used programming language > would appear to fall under the umbrella of comp.lang.misc. My question was not completely abstract. I did consider starting a discussion about possibility of inclusion of stackless co-routines into one of the future editions of C. Naturally, my ideas at this state are extremely in-concrete, much more so then the post of Thiago Adams that started this thread. So, if I ever come to it, which by itself is not very likely, do you think that comp.lang.misc would be better place than comp.lang.c ?