Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Michael S Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: Python recompile Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2025 16:15:51 +0200 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 16 Message-ID: <20250318161551.000000b2@yahoo.com> References: <874izvjs4m.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <87senfi7ii.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2025 15:15:52 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="022e822d9f16f9894cfc783320c1e1e6"; logging-data="2783024"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19QnBdVLtZvWHCWjrnFxh9SjMMTbgoVuQc=" Cancel-Lock: sha1:bwUovM94W2TNOjQriro0lxDf8Ic= X-Newsreader: Claws Mail 3.19.1 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-w64-mingw32) On Tue, 18 Mar 2025 11:48:41 +0000 Richard Harnden wrote: > On 18/03/2025 10:59, bart wrote: > > for a test file of nearly 1M lines. > > Any sane shop would reject a source file that long. > It's unmaintainable. > First, you response has very little to do with arguments that are going on. Second, huge "source" files tend to be computer-generated. So they are only source from POV of back-end compiler. From the POV of humans they are intermediate products. So, there are no concerns of maintainability.