Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Keith Thompson Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: "A diagram of C23 basic types" Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2025 15:56:03 -0700 Organization: None to speak of Lines: 25 Message-ID: <87tt6p11bw.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> References: <87y0wjaysg.fsf@gmail.com> <87cyde2vyf.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2025 00:56:13 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="d66e934c2e3cca42eaa548516797f624"; logging-data="788564"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+CvUOTAW3qc4mZkM65ga58" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cancel-Lock: sha1:kRUKtdLEt1MZo6Otcbm6XlmZ5RY= sha1:8lDTVkS2jE8su5B+JuiIQ8FBDo0= James Kuyper writes: [...] > The point is, the uncertainty in the date of his birth, whether > fictional or real, is far less than the 59 million year uncertainty in > the date of the Big Bang. In order for it to be comparably uncertain, we > would have to be unsure whether he was incarnated in the Mesozoic or > Cenozoic eras. [...] None of that is relevant. The uncertainty in the timing of the Big Bang and the birth of Christ are relevant to cosmologists, historians, and religious scholars, not to programmers who don't happen to be working in any of those fields. The uncertainty in the timing of January 1, 1970, where 1970 is a year number in the current almost universally accepted Gregorian calendar, is essentially zero. Same for any other less commonly used chosen epoch. The fact that the number 1970 is arbitrary is not a problem for software. In fact it's an advantage, since there's no uncertainty in the presence of any new information. -- Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com void Void(void) { Void(); } /* The recursive call of the void */