Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connectionsPath: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: WM Newsgroups: sci.logic Subject: Re: Simple enough for every reader? Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2025 13:44:42 +0200 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 21 Message-ID: <10365va$11afj$3@dont-email.me> References: <100a8ah$ekoh$1@dont-email.me> <101msm5$qln$1@dont-email.me> <101opv8$m16h$1@dont-email.me> <101pvvc$upfh$1@dont-email.me> <101rh76$1djtf$1@dont-email.me> <101sv4s$1o8bc$1@dont-email.me> <101u5sd$24q1b$1@dont-email.me> <101uh03$26rnt$2@dont-email.me> <10235vu$3lmmn$1@dont-email.me> <1029om9$1cir8$2@dont-email.me> <102bcgv$1rtqf$1@dont-email.me> <102bpch$1ud0p$2@dont-email.me> <102e17b$2ijkk$1@dont-email.me> <102e7cv$2jqav$1@dont-email.me> <102gse1$3c4uk$1@dont-email.me> <102ha1f$3f983$1@dont-email.me> <102jkju$52ir$1@dont-email.me> <102jva3$68hi$2@dont-email.me> <102m7g4$rqqe$1@dont-email.me> <102mrjb$10ko1$2@dont-email.me> <102ohr2$1gc76$1@dont-email.me> <102osui$1j1c3$1@dont-email.me> <102rfal$2am0a$1@dont-email.me> <102rhlt$2b85u$1@dont-email.me> <102u1gk$32100$1@dont-email.me> <102ug2t$35ekh$1@dont-email.me> <1030dft$3obvv$1@dont-email.me> <10315us$3tqn8$2@dont-email.me> <1033805$lvet$1@dont-email.me> <1033ks9$1075$1@dont-email.me> <10360hf$10lrl$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2025 13:44:43 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="1be23b1f474b15184d6d8ee1347268bc"; logging-data="1092083"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18ZiqCBT4+JFUDgnDcNuGPnGLVZLzF4ccw=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:tld2fZYTnxpW9OZgJA0mgykEdJ0= In-Reply-To: <10360hf$10lrl$1@dont-email.me> Content-Language: en-US On 21.06.2025 12:11, Mikko wrote: > On 2025-06-20 12:40:41 +0000, WM said: > >> On 20.06.2025 11:00, Mikko wrote: >>> On 2025-06-19 14:13:49 +0000, WM said: >> >>>> But removing all in their natural or any given order (that does not >>>> allow two or more to take the same place) implies a last removed one. >>> >>> No, it does not. That implication is not acceptable without a proof. >> >> Removing all means that none remains. > > True. But only those are removed that were there. What never was there > is not removed, and the last natural number was not. Consider only what has been removed. If all have been be removed, then a last one has been removed. Regards, WM