Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: HHH(DD) --- COMPUTE ACTUAL MAPPING FROM INPUT TO OUTPUT --- Using
 Finite String Transformations
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2025 14:47:35 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 43
Message-ID: <vue4gn$28iho$4@dont-email.me>
References: <vsnchj$23nrb$2@dont-email.me> <vto4vh$23i07$1@dont-email.me>
 <vto7qu$267in$1@dont-email.me> <k%RLP.1232047$Xb1.539402@fx05.ams4>
 <vtorpb$2uac$1@news.muc.de> <vtp32o$2vb5o$1@dont-email.me>
 <vtqpt5$17ns$1@news.muc.de> <vtrhbc$16pbv$2@dont-email.me>
 <vtrk7l$t44$1@news.muc.de> <vtrmfa$1be3n$1@dont-email.me>
 <vtvkgo$vjvi$1@dont-email.me> <vu2042$34l74$1@dont-email.me>
 <vu519u$1s5f9$1@dont-email.me> <vu6aha$2vn05$3@dont-email.me>
 <vu6dk4$2fq2$1@news.muc.de> <vu6knm$394oo$1@dont-email.me>
 <vu8cgm$2p5e$1@news.muc.de> <vu8gml$v0qa$2@dont-email.me>
 <vu8m2h$vn9b$2@dont-email.me> <vu8pr1$13jl5$8@dont-email.me>
 <vu8qo3$vn9b$4@dont-email.me> <vu8ruc$13jl5$12@dont-email.me>
 <vuaaae$2lbp9$2@dont-email.me>
 <zIWdnaZKufSzmpT1nZ2dnZfqnPadnZ2d@brightview.co.uk>
 <vub1go$3clpn$3@dont-email.me>
 <HcWcnf7heZkdG5T1nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@brightview.co.uk>
 <vucbg5$mukj$1@dont-email.me> <vucro3$148pf$2@dont-email.me>
 <vudtd9$23cvv$1@dont-email.me> <vue2k4$27hl3$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2025 21:47:40 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="8278b879b49e14b6990f113f300251ec";
	logging-data="2378296"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/drQbcM2xZz4koJlKeohMH"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:aq4C/W/2mowxUWqd+pSzPAQvHgU=
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
In-Reply-To: <vue2k4$27hl3$2@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 250424-14, 4/24/2025), Outbound message

On 4/24/2025 2:15 PM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
> Op 24.apr.2025 om 19:46 schreef olcott:
>> On 4/24/2025 3:11 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>>> Op 24.apr.2025 om 05:34 schreef olcott:
>>>> On 4/23/2025 7:31 PM, Mike Terry wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> ...because HHH stops simulating before reaching that step in the 
>>>>> computation.  Note that I said
>>>>>
>>>>> MT:  Both traces were of course /identical/,
>>>>>       *up to the point where HHH stops simulating*
>>>>>
>>>>> So I was factually correct.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Mike.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> It *is not* up to the point where HHH stops simulating.
>>>>
>>>> It is up to the point where the simulated versus directly
>>>> executed calls HHH(DD).
>>>>
>>> That is exactly the same point. If not, show the difference in the 
>>> traces before that point.
>>
>> As soon as the directly executed DD calls HHH(DD) this
>> call immediately returns.
>>
>> When DD emulated by HHH calls HHH(DD) then HHH emulates
>> DD and also emulates itself emulating DD. This is one
>> whole recursive emulation than the directly executed
>> DD can possibly get to.

> Again a lot of words, which hide that you cannot show where the traces 
> differ up to that point.

THEY DIFFER BY THE EMULATED DD REACHES RECURSIVE EMULATION
AND THE DIRECTLY EXECUTED DD NEVER DOES.

-- 
Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer