Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org
Newsgroups: comp.theory,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.c++
Subject: Re: DD correctly emulated by HHH --- Totally ignoring invalid
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2025 14:43:18 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 46
Message-ID: <vq73i5$1tjcg$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vq5qqc$1j128$2@dont-email.me>
 <vq6jam$1qp5e$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org>
 <vq729j$1tapm$2@dont-email.me>
Injection-Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2025 15:43:18 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="d86c9ca34ec4c10ab49e9729ffe53a4b";
	logging-data="2018704"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/suvcabTCKZr7gMQUAScxc"
Cancel-Lock: sha1:nd6/6bv0HaIPUShLVjDgbbr4n4w=

On Tue, 4 Mar 2025 08:21:39 -0600
olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> wibbled:
>On 3/4/2025 4:06 AM, Bonita Montero wrote:
>> Am 04.03.2025 um 04:07 schrieb olcott:
>>> int DD()
>>> {
>>>    int Halt_Status = HHH(DD);
>>>    if (Halt_Status)
>>>      HERE: goto HERE;
>>>    return Halt_Status;
>>> }
>>>
>>> _DD()
>>> [00002133] 55         push ebp      ; housekeeping
>>> [00002134] 8bec       mov ebp,esp   ; housekeeping
>>> [00002136] 51         push ecx      ; make space for local
>>> [00002137] 6833210000 push 00002133 ; push DD
>>> [0000213c] e882f4ffff call 000015c3 ; call HHH(DD)
>>> [00002141] 83c404     add esp,+04
>>> [00002144] 8945fc     mov [ebp-04],eax
>>> [00002147] 837dfc00   cmp dword [ebp-04],+00
>>> [0000214b] 7402       jz 0000214f
>>> [0000214d] ebfe       jmp 0000214d
>>> [0000214f] 8b45fc     mov eax,[ebp-04]
>>> [00002152] 8be5       mov esp,ebp
>>> [00002154] 5d         pop ebp
>>> [00002155] c3         ret
>>> Size in bytes:(0035) [00002155]
>>>
>>> DD correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly
>>> reach its own "ret" instruction and terminate normally.
>>>
>>> The only valid rebuttal is to show all of the steps of
>>> exactly how DD correctly emulated by HHH reaches its
>>> own "ret" instruction.
>>>
>> 
>> You're wrong; your program will never stop - like
>> your halting problem investigations.
>
>I am not wrong and no one can show that I wrong

You're making the assertion, so YOU need to prove the program will halt,
its not for others to prove that it won't.