Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!border-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.netnews.com!postmaster.netnews.com!us1.netnews.com!not-for-mail X-Trace: DXC=1GK8e1[d3ShgbAWgI2o77`HWonT5<]0TmdjI?Uho:Xek=aHS]UU?ATo;DBEWk]_cAaMgHZVBa_@R`e=C8jV From: Michael Trew In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 9 Message-ID: <67913daf$5$2328641$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 127.0.0.1 X-Trace: 1737571759 reader.netnews.com 2328641 127.0.0.1:55681 On 1/16/2025 1:57 PM, JAB wrote: > Walgreens CEO describes drawback of anti-shoplifting strategy: 'When > you lock things up...you don't sell as many of them' > > https://fortune.com/2025/01/14/walgreens-ceo-anti-shoplifting-backfired-locks-reduce-sales/ Sure enough, I see the same thing at our local antique mall. If it's locked up in a case, we sell at least 2/3 fewer things. You miss many impulse sales with a locked case, especially for lower priced items.