Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connectionsPath: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Keith Thompson Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: do { quit; } else { } Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2025 20:51:13 -0700 Organization: None to speak of Lines: 34 Message-ID: <87o6x3tky6.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> References: <86plhodtsw.fsf@linuxsc.com> <20250407210248.00006457@yahoo.com> <868qoaeezc.fsf@linuxsc.com> <86mscqcpy1.fsf@linuxsc.com> <86iknecjz8.fsf@linuxsc.com> <86o6x5at05.fsf@linuxsc.com> <20250409170901.947@kylheku.com> <20250410092409.825@kylheku.com> <86jz7rbh2z.fsf@linuxsc.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2025 05:51:14 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="c7132c9dc01e9da84b004e8ef39b7407"; logging-data="662889"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19FPr6qqRPhe7Ib+xXLSqKL" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cancel-Lock: sha1:9g3FxiEiPJbI+rPrbYnzMjTbDuM= sha1:5qXpvfOrEL8ZblqF+5PNoI7o67k= Tim Rentsch writes: > bart writes: > > [... compatibility of struct types ...] > >> The example was like this: >> >> module A: typedef struct point {float a; float b;} Point; >> >> module B: typedef float length; >> typedef struct _tag {length x, y;} vector; >> >> David Brown said: "The two types are entirely compatible." >> >> I said: "Are they?" >> >> Tim Rentsch said: "No, they are not." > > I withdraw my earlier statement. Please leave me out of any > future discussion of the subject. Do you mean that your earlier statement was incorrect (i.e., that the types are compatible), or do you merely wish to pretend you never said anything without taking a position on whether they're compatible, or do you refuse to say? Don't worry, I'm not planning to start or participate in a lengthy discussion on your statement (that never turns out well). I'm inviting you to clarify if you choose to do so. If you choose not to reply to this, I'll resume my earlier stance of not caring. -- Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com void Void(void) { Void(); } /* The recursive call of the void */