Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Keith Thompson Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: do { quit; } else { } Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2025 11:24:10 -0700 Organization: None to speak of Lines: 21 Message-ID: <87iknasgj9.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> References: <86plhodtsw.fsf@linuxsc.com> <20250407210248.00006457@yahoo.com> <20250409142303.00004645@yahoo.com> <87ikndqabc.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <20250410115501.000037a5@yahoo.com> <20250410080629.532@kylheku.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2025 20:24:11 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="c7132c9dc01e9da84b004e8ef39b7407"; logging-data="2384762"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18V3qAtrkVyzu01kPLVPCgN" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cancel-Lock: sha1:FVWc2qjweRv4MIS2nmtKyYAmIH8= sha1:5fKAr4mO71EeaJiWZT+uFcyGZvc= bart writes: > On 11/04/2025 15:25, David Brown wrote: >> On 11/04/2025 13:51, bart wrote: [...] >>> That makes it pretty complicated to me! And I can't see that any of >>> these are necessary. >> No one suggested it was at all necessary. > > /You/ did: "That is not more complicated, nor is it without good reason." Bart, you need to stop misrepresenting what other people have written. David absolutely did not say that it was necessary. Your quotation of what he wrote clearly demonstrates that. Read what people write, not what you think they meant. [...] -- Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com void Void(void) { Void(); } /* The recursive call of the void */