Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Tim Rentsch
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: Suggested method for returning a string from a C program?
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2025 10:54:16 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <86r02iicl3.fsf@linuxsc.com>
References: <20250326110011.634@kylheku.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Injection-Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2025 18:54:18 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="3a6190fab936320ab0975276fac84019";
logging-data="838525"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+2rOOQeUxC2a0sFhFFVxqhKaiPFgzdh7s="
User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.4 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:RuN3AbK0D2MqVvZZy6XwB+03leQ=
sha1:ggPGMHSM9bGf6yacV5x21fgju6s=
scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) writes:
> [...] I have one
> source file that takes almost 7 minutes to compile
> when using -O3 on a very-high-end xeon box. Mostly
> buried in the overall compile time when using parallel
> make.
>
> The code could be restructured to compile in a few seconds;
> but that would require substantial changes to the rest
> of the codebase. Compiling with -O0 for development
> testing reduces the compile time to a few seconds.
How long does it take compiling with -O1?