Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Jerald Warszawski Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.math Subject: Re: The first postulate is a truism. Followup-To: sci.physics.relativity,sci.math Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2025 14:03:43 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 21 Message-ID: <10392fv$icp7$1@dont-email.me> References: <10338b9$m1ka$1@dont-email.me> <10360vv$10p6e$1@dont-email.me> <1rebzma.1ovikw0894wqnN%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2025 16:03:44 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="915dcb65b653f5c916163e9e7bc8d9e4"; logging-data="602919"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+GwsZRajokGihji6yYOIQD" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:Ui8AqyByfCtP0usFtCpIS1Rw4R0= Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAGFBMVEVzHzfhRkrh ZKOGXGPx2erhuaqfoYsSCw7PtlY/AAACYUlEQVQ4jU2TwY6jMAyG06KK69B5gRK GnjN4odeVNum5CnHOow1kr0jVTF5/nQTaRghEPn47/m2Y9877XvUo89JV9VYACO bjctbYKQOsE4AVzA06kxX8rXp/AI9n41eFrndvDzChHbYkyJ/AKVRz3lbIGRPFC npt1s+lOkMIbAO/NBqFUklllGAhhBXApFtEVN4gNqIksCTgxEGeFVqxDNiOcT8s HWfgoGAzSlcu9L6BTx4VvWUDhD2OoWt1BnueclDlZSGKD1GYDMJuBSAbuu01tPp C318CS6GGsZf6jCBajihCOIwhhxrIP322fdNhi6ewTNfQ1QkYso4jbzpSnMJBKs arCHopDXLOa85bbO7oEfgxApNNpV0yoPkeoecZbH7Thfr0/QUdyQlM8rkI/Ni/L UVlGIFCs3VJfP9peVRgTMF1Z9a+lj83ngG1Tn/IkYjSnDflDyXixwworQI6Ea9B lHdNKVYglegocF2/U/8WjccEKLhqGM0FNBUwAjRaVQSTvHoaybIMRcHI9MXUdQS 2RwclS11Y0n2u6iodlzrB4mzkFoXQHTOw3rOZc++tuCSwr6oEEC0Yshf9AJcVHD OI0bznQ3E/pX4/gXW3efawwG0FyZIRZhxFX7AAfVTcqxU4GmFBhYU76AiWWEU61 WdNdTFWFD0Xr4ByjzTFgwMFsZR9rCID58LdgTe3VP8LsC4s5KVdp7PagJ2uX2Hg brVkl1JkS4zaDKRnFiQFOf8vhAc4ZmAnpQb5+wF2G5isAvovH4JdjkTgimSuvLw KkiWDNHFKxodgA9c8g/hSRKrwP4HVM0JEOZv2AAAAAElFTkSuQmCC X-Face: &MHE"[4aTc0D'y}}%EFUY>Q]C4%T_E2H{])$J\[s=BI\L,JbiT{5/e8i[?}^V-k> B2AsYj=nDzra+wG3\'{~,$EWbD71i{4\u@}.rC{r.[$i#>0>Oi%pU9)Q*XN}0A(oQ";02Jz ORK)'y1[4ho"t`7=/0YD7JM!6}R-?QX'q);2n/^MY=^A4fR0N/R'|Yv#3iI*~;Qme5}xqV` GSr\}8>c@',t!e57Mx|s.qxJ[flW%LkpTTjFb$f+[Es*E%w`?U_KT$UE7o"_]DO'B3Vqua" tX:!3FfyH8> J. J. Lodder wrote: >> I did explain. And what I said was indeed known long before Einstein. >> >> If the first postulate were a truism nobody would ever have believed >> otherwise. But ancinet literature shows that the opposite belief was >> common. > > Indeed. > In particular Maxwell's equations were generally believed before 1905 to > hold only in one prefered frame. (the rest frame of the aether) > > Einstein's postulate applied to electromagnetism was new and > revolutionary, and seen as such at the time, > (by those who mattered) blatantly nonsense. The proof for aether is that it exists in vacuum. You empty the vacuum of matter, aether still exists. And there is not electromagnetism but resonance, as in air. Also, the Einstine was in the business of stealing patents, like anyother jew, in return for academic degrees.