Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: AMuzi Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech Subject: Re: Caught in rain Date: Thu, 8 May 2025 07:51:47 -0500 Organization: Yellow Jersey, Ltd. Lines: 74 Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Thu, 08 May 2025 14:51:45 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="2f8098fb7167d010f3df8f74f6e15a0b"; logging-data="1893902"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19akQcQ26nfO6UIg+Ms52QN" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:gkkOrPyfxt5DZ9oTOYZTFblrBWo= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: On 5/8/2025 7:12 AM, Zen Cycle wrote: > On 5/7/2025 7:49 PM, Jeff Liebermann wrote: >> On Wed, 7 May 2025 07:24:50 -0400, Zen Cycle >> >> wrote: >> >>> I rinse mine for a few minutes in a coffee can with brake >>> cleaner >>> (https://www.grainger.com/product/CRC-Brake-Cleaner- >>> Solvent-35WT64) >> >> Almost pure dry cleaning solvent: > > Yup, and it works great as a degreaser. > >> >> >>    Chemical name:  tetrachloroethylene >>    Common name and synonyms:  perchloroethylene >>    CAS number:  127-18-4 >>    %  90 - 100% >> >> "EPA Proposes Ban on All Consumer and Many Commercial Uses of >> Perchloroethylene to Protect Public Health" >> > consumer-and-many-commercial-uses-perchloroethylene-protect> > > I'm not to worried about this administrations actions having > anything to do with protecting public health. Quite the > opposite, in fact. > https://www.nbcnews.com/science/environment/epa-rollback- > environmental-regulations-zeldin-rcna196112 > >> >> "Risk Management for Perchloroethylene (PCE)"  (Dec 2024) >> > under-tsca/risk-management-perchloroethylene-pce> >> "EPA has set a 10-year phaseout for the use of PCE in dry >> cleaning to >> eliminate the risk to people who work or spend >> considerable time at >> dry cleaning facilities." > > It's a good thing I'm not using it for dry cleaning then. In > the meantime, there's no talk of banning it as an industrial > solvent (degreaser). > > I agree with limiting it in cases where people may be > exposed to it all day everyday, like dry cleaner employees. > For people that use it a couple time a week in a garage, not > likely that big of a deal. For someone who uses a pint to > clean a batch of bike chains every couple of months - > there's more risk from the diesel fumes I inhale during my > commutes. > > +1 A little perspective can be quite helpful. A distinct outlier is California's Prop 65: https://oag.ca.gov/prop65/faq which requires notice for anything with 1/1000 of the lowest reported harmful level by any study for any material or product. That has crossed from safety into harassment. -- Andrew Muzi am@yellowjersey.org Open every day since 1 April, 1971