Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?Arne_Vajh=C3=B8j?= Newsgroups: comp.os.vms Subject: Re: Upcoming time boundary events Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2025 21:49:59 -0400 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 16 Message-ID: <101j008$2ob01$1@dont-email.me> References: <100fp4v$1nmtf$1@dont-email.me> <100omli$3t023$1@dont-email.me> <100qdop$6q13$1@dont-email.me> <100qg5t$3jb0$1@dont-email.me> <1014ad8$2jurh$1@dont-email.me> <874ix3np14.fsf@atr2.ath.cx> <101dc6r$mkpm$12@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2025 03:50:00 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="2603df1f68bd005b514d16f806c72d71"; logging-data="2894849"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18hW09sj8xl5+4HkVH4W8a8fQwLLYfQHjQ=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:h2KHTgnI9QqEBGo/UFIk/P8M5t4= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <101dc6r$mkpm$12@dont-email.me> On 5/30/2025 6:41 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: > On Fri, 30 May 2025 09:46:27 +0200, Marc Van Dyck wrote: >> Well, is anyone else proposing a suitable replacement for FAL and >> transparent task to task communication ? > > The irony of it, that the DEC concept requires creating a separate server > process for every client connection, It doesn't. Processes are re-used for task to task servers. Arne