Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Richard Damon Newsgroups: comp.theory Subject: Re: DD correctly emulated by HHH --- Kicking the straw-man deception out on its ass Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2025 22:46:31 -0500 Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org) Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2025 03:46:32 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="2590635"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="diqKR1lalukngNWEqoq9/uFtbkm5U+w3w6FQ0yesrXg"; User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Content-Language: en-US X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 In-Reply-To: On 3/2/25 9:22 PM, olcott wrote: > On 3/2/2025 6:42 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >> On 3/2/25 4:49 PM, olcott wrote: >>> On 3/2/2025 3:29 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >>>> On 3/2/25 4:21 PM, olcott wrote: >>>>> int DD() >>>>> { >>>>>    int Halt_Status = HHH(DD); >>>>>    if (Halt_Status) >>>>>      HERE: goto HERE; >>>>>    return Halt_Status; >>>>> } >>>>> >>>>> _DD() >>>>> [00002133] 55         push ebp      ; housekeeping >>>>> [00002134] 8bec       mov ebp,esp   ; housekeeping >>>>> [00002136] 51         push ecx      ; make space for local >>>>> [00002137] 6833210000 push 00002133 ; push DD >>>>> [0000213c] e882f4ffff call 000015c3 ; call HHH(DD) >>>>> [00002141] 83c404     add esp,+04 >>>>> [00002144] 8945fc     mov [ebp-04],eax >>>>> [00002147] 837dfc00   cmp dword [ebp-04],+00 >>>>> [0000214b] 7402       jz 0000214f >>>>> [0000214d] ebfe       jmp 0000214d >>>>> [0000214f] 8b45fc     mov eax,[ebp-04] >>>>> [00002152] 8be5       mov esp,ebp >>>>> [00002154] 5d         pop ebp >>>>> [00002155] c3         ret >>>>> Size in bytes:(0035) [00002155] >>>>> >>>>> DD emulated by HHH according to the behavior that DD >>>>> specifies cannot possibly reach its own "ret" instruction >>>>> and terminate normally. >>>> >>>> WHich only shows that HHH can not correctly emulate its input and >>>> give an answer. >>>> >>> >>> The fact that HHH does correctly determine that DD >>> emulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own "ret" >>> instruction and terminate normally proves that your >>> claim is counter factual. >> >> You say that, but it isn't true, > > You keep trying to get away with saying that the > fact that DD calls its own emulator in recursive > emulation does not change the behavior from the > behavior of the directly executed DD. > > AT THIS POINT THAT BECOMES VERY STUPIDLY WRONG. > SINCE WE KNOW THAT YOU ARE NOT THAT STUPID WHAT ELSE IS LEFT? > > And you keep on making the claim without evidence!!!! What instruction acted differently between the to, that was directly executied and correctly emulated to different results. Your failure to specify this, just proves you are just a blantant and pathetic liar that knows he doesn't have any ground to stand on. All you are doing is PROVING to the world that you live in the world of make-beleive where you think the Truth_Fairy is able to make you wishes come true, even though they are false. Note, DD doesn't call "its own" emulator, it call the emulator/decider HHH, the one you claim gets the right answer, and thus is the one that aborts and returns 0. Your attempts to make it something else just shows that you lie, and are so stupid you don't see the errors in your claims.