Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.szaf.org!news.karotte.org!news.space.net!news.muc.de!.POSTED.news.muc.de!not-for-mail From: Alan Mackenzie Newsgroups: comp.theory Subject: Re: neos Universal Compiler Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2025 11:02:49 -0000 (UTC) Organization: muc.de e.V. Message-ID: References: <3KgBP.513160$Kb9a.94584@fx16.ams4> Injection-Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2025 11:02:49 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: news.muc.de; posting-host="news.muc.de:2001:608:1000::2"; logging-data="7819"; mail-complaints-to="news-admin@muc.de" User-Agent: tin/2.6.4-20241224 ("Helmsdale") (FreeBSD/14.2-RELEASE-p1 (amd64)) Mikko wrote: > On 2025-03-18 14:08:50 +0000, Mr Flibble said: >> On Tue, 18 Mar 2025 15:59:45 +0200, Mikko wrote: [ .... ] >>> Is there a neosBNF schema that describes the tokens of FORtRAN 66 or >>> Algol 60? >> Not yet. > The definition of string literal of Algol 60 would be a good example > of something that cannot be defined with a regular expression and is > therefore impossible or at least complicated with an ordinary tokenizer. Would you please be more specific about just what in an Algol 60 string literal prevents a regexp from parsing it. Not for any special reason, just that I'm curious. Maybe an example of such a string would be interesting. Thanks! > -- > Mikko -- Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).