Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: Cantor Diagonal Proof
Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2025 22:25:47 +0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 40
Message-ID: <fce811c8a1d30ec8ab27d2ea978193d753d7d64d.camel@gmail.com>
References: <vsn1fu$1p67k$1@dont-email.me>
	 <7EKdnTIUz9UkpXL6nZ2dnZfqn_ednZ2d@brightview.co.uk>
	 <vsng73$27sdj$1@dont-email.me>
	 <gGKdnZiYPJVC03L6nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@brightview.co.uk>
	 <vsnk2v$2fc5a$1@dont-email.me> <vsnmtg$2i4qp$3@dont-email.me>
	 <vsno7m$2g4cd$3@dont-email.me> <vsnp0o$2ka6o$2@dont-email.me>
	 <vsnpv4$2g4cd$6@dont-email.me> <vsntes$2osdn$1@dont-email.me>
	 <vsntv3$2paf9$1@dont-email.me> <vso1a0$2sf7o$1@dont-email.me>
	 <vso2ff$2tj1d$2@dont-email.me> <vso3rj$2vems$2@dont-email.me>
	 <vso4gh$2vg3b$1@dont-email.me> <vsqmlb$1ktm5$6@dont-email.me>
	 <vsqobq$1mglg$3@dont-email.me> <vst44k$8daf$1@dont-email.me>
	 <vst6t0$aeqh$1@dont-email.me> <vst7qs$bmfg$3@dont-email.me>
	 <45bb7521c3bb68fe5fd47d10ee93a03de17f8d47.camel@gmail.com>
	 <vstld0$pkmr$1@dont-email.me>
	 <809a03d4b71e717fca7bf77bd900c4e977844c2d.camel@gmail.com>
	 <vt02b9$3abfr$1@dont-email.me>
	 <15646f711ca9eac71a97c035c2a7e155bf8934f9.camel@gmail.com>
	 <vt2jda$1oofj$1@dont-email.me> <vt2mol$1qud5$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Injection-Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2025 16:25:48 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="6e1f11aad64c740959bbf40a4daa19c4";
	logging-data="2536241"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19BXvpVwE9NU7XNiaWJ3pZ5"
User-Agent: Evolution 3.54.3 (3.54.3-1.fc41)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:7p4dleOpVKG48MMbpo8yt0qCqO4=
In-Reply-To: <vt2mol$1qud5$2@dont-email.me>

On Tue, 2025-04-08 at 09:29 +0100, Richard Heathfield wrote:
> On 08/04/2025 08:31, Mikko wrote:
> > On 2025-04-07 10:31:28 +0000, wij said:
> >=20
> > > On Mon, 2025-04-07 at 11:28 +0300, Mikko wrote:
> > > > On 2025-04-06 10:42:05 +0000, wij said:
> > > >=20
> > > > > On Sun, 2025-04-06 at 13:35 +0300, Mikko wrote:
> > > > > > On 2025-04-06 07:15:51 +0000, wij said:
> > > > > >=20
> > > > > > > Simply put, repeating decimals are irrational.
> > > > > > > https://sourceforge.net/projects/cscall/files/MisFiles/RealNu=
mber2-en.txt/download
> > > > > > >=20
> > > > > > >=20
> > > > > >=20
> > > > > > Repeating decimals are rational.
> > > > >=20
> > > > > Prove it (be sure not to make mistakes shown in the link above)
> > > >=20
> > > > See>=20
> > > > https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/549254/why-is-a-repeating-=
decimal-a-rational-number
> > >=20
> > > Still can't prove, except posting a copy from the internet?
> >=20
> > So you are only trolling?
>=20
> Hasn't he just proved that by claiming that recurring decimals=20
> are irrational? 1/3, 1/7, 1/11, 1/13, 1/17... all irrational!

Just remind you, your post showed that you don't understand 1. what the def=
inition
is. 2. what a proof should be (the above statement is another evidence).
3. your understand is 'by belief'.

> Perhaps we should pass a hat round.
>=20