Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: WM Newsgroups: sci.math Subject: Re: The set of necessary FISONs Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2025 12:38:13 +0100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 9 Message-ID: References: <903de8e1-3538-4cfe-9f7a-6509eda47ab6@att.net> <3844edd7-0750-4418-bff6-2759817446b3@att.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2025 12:38:13 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="070749b6ef36b80f3e85f929ce6d891c"; logging-data="860053"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/4nYtFcs9VqnvEJrZmR09LrB+CzLI3tRM=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:sBcQ+sxzxUUdg1eKT1Z30cntT+A= In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US On 26.01.2025 23:31, Richard Damon wrote: > I make no claim that there is a specific set of "necessary" FISONs, Hence we can go through the sequence of FISONs one by one and eliminate each one such that none remains. Regards, WM