Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Richard Heathfield Newsgroups: comp.theory Subject: Re: Cantor Diagonal Proof Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2025 05:20:04 +0100 Organization: Fix this later Lines: 13 Message-ID: References: <875xjfd5rs.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <87tt6zblzl.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <0920ac6e196c1cebeff36d8b9431ee12a7b3d527@i2pn2.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2025 06:20:08 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="6b00b5cbd09486fb855caeea624ce8c7"; logging-data="701751"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+5Yvp0qjjCiuL3sUTaL/yKNfzWyNmPbPT5E7m9JSWaNQ==" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:fH2jvUps35ggl70bbkcHmOe4UDA= Content-Language: en-GB In-Reply-To: On 11/04/2025 01:29, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: > That’s a key point of my proof: if it converges, then the number is > already in the list. No, it isn't. It differs in the nth digit from the nth number in the list. If it doesn't, it isn't the Cantor diagonal. -- Richard Heathfield Email: rjh at cpax dot org dot uk "Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999 Sig line 4 vacant - apply within