Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: candycanearter07 Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action Subject: Re: A (small) Step In The Right Direction Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2025 19:10:08 -0000 (UTC) Organization: the-candyden-of-code Lines: 79 Message-ID: References: Injection-Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2025 21:10:08 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="77afba931595fe5ca9f7a7c5fc28a1d1"; logging-data="1107521"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19yXutHpsBClMAuIYL5FEqmBY6ipKVmOSd+QRp/01OY4w==" User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:azt09DF+URwrqHslGT50Pmabtg0= X-Face: b{dPmN&%4|lEo,wUO\"KLEOu5N_br(N2Yuc5/qcR5i>9-!^e\.Tw9?/m0}/~:UOM:Zf]% b+ V4R8q|QiU/R8\|G\WpC`-s?=)\fbtNc&=/a3a)r7xbRI]Vl)r<%PTriJ3pGpl_/B6!8pe\btzx `~R! r3.0#lHRE+^Gro0[cjsban'vZ#j7,?I/tHk{s=TFJ:H?~=]`O*~3ZX`qik`b:.gVIc-[$t/e ZrQsWJ >|l^I_[pbsIqwoz.WGA] wrote at 15:05 this Saturday (GMT): > On Fri, 28 Mar 2025 17:46:53 -0700, Dimensional Traveler > wrote: > >>On 3/28/2025 4:14 PM, Zaghadka wrote: >>> On Fri, 28 Mar 2025 20:24:24 +0000, in comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action, Ant >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Justisaur wrote: >>>>> On 3/28/2025 7:15 AM, Zaghadka wrote: >>>>>> On Thu, 27 Mar 2025 11:36:37 -0400, in comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action, >>>>>> Spalls Hurgenson wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Steam's "you're only sharing the entire >>>>>>> library" method adds a certain distance to this that shields them from >>>>>>> these questions, but by allowing single-game license-transfers, >>>>>>> Nintendo opens themselves up to this next step. >>>>>> >>>>>> I think Steam now allows simultaneous different games playable from the >>>>>> same shared library. So long as the sharing party isn't playing the >>>>>> particular game you want to play, you can play their other games. IIRC >>>>>> >>>>>> Don't remember when it happened. Not sure if I'm remembering correctly. I >>>>>> do know that I don't get "Hooray! Lemonhead's* games are available to >>>>>> play now!" messages any more. >>>>>> >>>> >>>>> Sort of. I just did this with the kids. You have to add them as a >>>>> friend first, then add them as family. They can play any game that >>>>> neither of the other of us are playing that one of us owns. If you want >>>>> to play say something together (which I did want to do with my daughter >>>>> and dark souls,) then you still need to have them actually buy a copy >>>>> though. (Ended up not doing this as it was obviously way too hard for >>>>> her even with my hints and she quit before she even got to a spot we >>>>> could play together.) >>>> >>>> Interesting. Oh, let's start a family to share our Stea games. ;) >>> >>> Sure thing step-bro! >>> >>Step-ant! noo dont step on ant :( > You joke, but that's actually a possibility. The different family > members don't even have to be in the same vicinity as one another; > they can be an ocean apart and still have access to all your games. > Nor does Valve do any real checking to ensure that 'family members' > are actually related. > > The main restrictions are that > > a) you can only add so many people to your family group*, > > b) you can only add or remove people so often and so many times*, > > and > > c) shitty behavior by somebody playing games in your libray can > reflect badly on you (so if little Jimmy gets caught cheating > playing your copy of Counterstrike, it could be YOU that gets > the VAC-ban). > > Also, if games have other onerous DRM/account requirements (e.g., 'you > must have a Ubisoft account to use this game') they won't show up on > the shared library. Which means an increasingly large number of > triple-A games are excluded from sharing. Sigh.. classic Ubisoft > > > > * again, too lazy to check for the specific numbers Yeah, I know a friend who does that to get free games. -- user is generated from /dev/urandom