Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: olcott Newsgroups: comp.theory,sci.logic Subject: Re: My reviewers think that halt deciders must report on the behavior of their caller --- Mike Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2025 08:24:00 -0500 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 60 Message-ID: <104oetg$sdlv$1@dont-email.me> References: <101nq32$99vd$1@dont-email.me> <104cud2$1r72a$2@dont-email.me> <104e46s$28pqb$2@dont-email.me> <960c2417e6f691b2b12703506c207990df5b39ab@i2pn2.org> <104el09$2dpog$1@dont-email.me> <1ca786773f9ff02718c66e082bbc4182b36732ab@i2pn2.org> <104fduv$2n8gq$2@dont-email.me> <104ftep$rafj$1@dont-email.me> <104h475$324da$1@dont-email.me> <104hmkm$35gkb$2@dont-email.me> <104i0ar$36mma$1@dont-email.me> <775a1f21c8d308989a8ef2a0afaae66c1609912b@i2pn2.org> <104jc8l$3jrpl$9@dont-email.me> <104jpu7$3np76$1@dont-email.me> <104jsnj$3o6as$1@dont-email.me> <6e8be9ed51dfe82150849a119c5f6433bf7e2082@i2pn2.org> <104lscc$7l4q$11@dont-email.me> <104n9p9$lg9t$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2025 15:24:00 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="5e1c5002647e5c8eaded405aea18dbaf"; logging-data="931519"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX185BRJ47zRzYA1/pjfzSh8G" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:xJCcAdm/+jlnkTPSRCEP39yD4kw= X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Content-Language: en-US X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 250710-4, 7/10/2025), Outbound message In-Reply-To: On 7/10/2025 6:35 AM, Richard Damon wrote: > On 7/9/25 10:50 PM, olcott wrote: >> On 7/9/2025 8:49 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >>> On 7/9/25 9:55 AM, olcott wrote: >>>> On 7/9/2025 6:44 AM, Richard Damon wrote: >>>>> On 7/8/25 3:49 PM, olcott wrote: >>>>>> On 7/8/2025 2:01 PM, Mike Terry wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This is one of PO's practiced tactics - he makes a claim, and >>>>>>> regardless of how patently false that claim appears, he refuses >>>>>>> to logically defend the claim beyond saying "the claim is true, >>>>>>> and if you understood xxx you would realise it is true". >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> All of my claims are easily verified facts to those >>>>>> with the capacity to verify them. >>>>>> >>>>>> void DDD() >>>>>> { >>>>>>    HHH(DDD); >>>>>>    return; >>>>>> } >>>>>> >>>>>> _DDD() >>>>>> [00002192] 55             push ebp >>>>>> [00002193] 8bec           mov ebp,esp >>>>>> [00002195] 6892210000     push 00002192  // push DDD >>>>>> [0000219a] e833f4ffff     call 000015d2  // call HHH >>>>>> [0000219f] 83c404         add esp,+04 >>>>>> [000021a2] 5d             pop ebp >>>>>> [000021a3] c3             ret >>>>>> Size in bytes:(0018) [000021a3] >>>>> >>>>> Not a program, must include the code for HHH to be simulatable. >>>>> >>>> >>>> You must have dementia. >>>> I have told you that HHH does emulate DDD >>>> then it emulates itself emulating DDD 500 times now. >>>> >>> >>> And thus you admit that you are lying. >>> >> >> *Here is the proof* >> https://liarparadox.org/HHH(DDD)_Full_Trace.pdf >> >> > > SO, you admit that HHH fails to emulate JUST the input, *I have told you that HHH does emulate DDD* *then it emulates itself emulating DDD 500 times now* *NOW I PROVED THAT* *See if you can remember this by your next reply* -- Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer