Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!nntp-feed.chiark.greenend.org.uk!ewrotcd!news.eyrie.org!beagle.ediacara.org!.POSTED.beagle.ediacara.org!not-for-mail From: RonO Newsgroups: talk.origins Subject: Re: Human testing should have been done for the dairy virus Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2024 20:20:30 -0600 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 169 Sender: to%beagle.ediacara.org Approved: moderator@beagle.ediacara.org Message-ID: References: Reply-To: rokimoto557@gmail.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: beagle.ediacara.org; posting-host="beagle.ediacara.org:3.132.105.89"; logging-data="68377"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@beagle.ediacara.org" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird To: talk-origins@moderators.isc.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:A+yUdn4dUUQWZt+TMvdhJozOEMw= Return-Path: X-Original-To: talk-origins@ediacara.org Delivered-To: talk-origins@ediacara.org id 26100229782; Mon, 30 Dec 2024 21:20:43 -0500 (EST) by beagle.ediacara.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EED78229765 for ; Mon, 30 Dec 2024 21:20:40 -0500 (EST) by moderators.individual.net (Exim 4.98) for talk-origins@moderators.isc.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (envelope-from ) id 1tSRs4-00000003oN2-0RTT; Tue, 31 Dec 2024 03:20:36 +0100 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.eternal-september.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4341C5FD66 for ; Tue, 31 Dec 2024 02:20:31 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: name/4341C5FD66; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com id C2E6FDC01A9; Tue, 31 Dec 2024 03:20:30 +0100 (CET) X-Injection-Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2024 03:20:30 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: X-Auth-Sender: U2FsdGVkX1/nSlQNsSTa14XzcE79KR4LrEyPZMtBKaQ= Content-Language: en-US FREEMAIL_FORGED_REPLYTO,FREEMAIL_REPLYTO_END_DIGIT, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_IN_WELCOMELIST,USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 smtp.eternal-september.org On 12/30/2024 12:05 PM, RonO wrote: > https://www.cbsnews.com/news/leana-wen-bird-flu-testing-h5n1-virus-face- > the-nation/ > > I am not the only one that understands what should have been happening > since day one.  The tragic thing is that the CDC never wanted to do the > right thing. > > QUOTE: > Dr. Leana Wen said Sunday that the lack of testing for bird flu doesn't > mean that the virus isn't alive in humans, and that she feels the > federal government "should have learned our lesson from COVID" and > should be proactive in making tests available for Americans — and not > wait for labs to characterize the cases and their severity. > > "I feel like we should have learned our lesson from COVID, that just > because we aren't testing doesn't mean the virus isn't there," said Dr. > Leana Wen, a former Baltimore health commissioner, on "Face the Nation > with Margaret Brennan." > END QUOTE: > > It should be noted that the CDC was initially for testing for Covid, but > they screwed up, and instead of adopting working tests that other > countries had already developed they made their own test that did not > work.  This was a strike against the reliability of testing, and allowed > the kooks to interfere with the testing and contact tracing that should > have started early in the Covid Pandemic. > > The CDC had a similar excuse for not starting testing and contact > tracing with the Dairy virus.  Their test was unreliable again.  It > consisted of two PCR tests, and one of the tests routinely failed making > the test results suspect.  The CDC had to start assuring the people > using the test that they could still rely on the one working test, but > that they needed to verify the testing results with more testing.  It > took the CDC months to fix this defect because they blamed the company > that they had contracted to make the tests, and wanted the company to > fix the mess.  They wasted months in squabbles with that company when > all they needed to do was get another company to make a functional test. >  So for around the first 5 months of the dairy epidemic we did not have > a fully reliable test for the virus. > > The CDC refused to start a dairy worker testing program even though they > knew that the dairy workers were being infected from the first cases in > Texas.  They wanted to deny that worker infections were significant even > when poultry farms started to go down and it was very unlikely that they > have had contact with anything but dairy workers.  The initial surveys > in Michigan and Texas found out that over 20 percent of workers on > infected dairies worked on other farms and that 7% of them also worked > on poultry farms. > > Back in early November when it was found that 7 to 10% of dairy workers > had likely been infected in Colorado and Michigan by testing for > antibodies the CDC finally claimed that they were going to start a > worker testing program in order to detect the infected and give them > antivirals to reduce the virus production in them and reduce the chance > of the virus mutating.  Nothing has come of that claim and no results > have been put out for what the CDC actually ended up doing, which seems > to be nothing.  It has been 2 months of nothing. > > It looks like we have been very lucky with the dairy virus H5N1 genotype > B3.13.  It seems to have a limited infection range in terms of tissue. > It can infect the gut, mammary glands and apparently tear ducts, but it > is not a respiratory infection.  The mutations to better infect humans > do not seem to be selected for among virus infecting those tissues.  If > we had been dealing with genotype D1.1 that has infected two humams (one > in British Columbia and the other in Louisiana) we would likely already > be dealing with a tragically severe pandemic.  D1.1 does infect > respiratory tissue, and the mutations needed to better infect humans > have occurred in both human cases making these patients severely ill. > This indicates that the mutations needed to make it a pandemic virus > commonly occur, and can be selected for in the certain tissues that the > virus propagates in.  The teenager in Canada was in critical condition > at one point, and the Lousiana patient is in the ICU.  In both cases the > wild bird virus did not have the needed mutations, but they likely > occurred during the infection of both patients.  So it looks like the > CDC's ass has been saved by the biology of the dairy virus.  My guess is > that the mutations that we worry about are selected against in the human > and cattle tissues that the Dairy virus can infect at this time. > > This should not absolve the CDC and USDA from not dealing with the dairy > epidemic as it should have been dealt with.  The USDA should have been > testing all the dairies from day one.  They likely would have prevented > many herd infections and many fewer poultry flocks would have gone down > with the dairy virus, and most importantly many fewer dairy and poultry > workers would have been infected. > > https://www.michiganfarmnews.com/usda-releases-findings-of- > investigation-into-hpai-spread-in-michigan > > This was a June news release. > > QUOTE: > So how did it spread? > Apart from the potential for resident wild birds or peri-domestic > species to move and transmit the virus, APHIS reported that the only > other potential transmission routes found from dairy herds to the > poultry flocks were through shared employment, housing, or movement of > employees. > > Investigators found that approximately 22 employees of three poultry > flocks worked weekend shifts at two different dairy premises. Shared > housing between dairy and poultry workers was also identified between > three poultry premises and two dairy premises, with APHIS noting that > dairy and poultry employees have social contact too. > END QUOTE: > > QUOTE: > According to APHIS, key findings identified to date and potential risk > factors for local transmission included: > > Shared personnel between premises > 20% of affected dairies’ employees and 7% of dairies’ employees family > members work on other dairy premises > END QUOTE: > > This is why I came up with my estimate that infection of 5% dairy worker > could account for the spread of the virus to states that did not get > cattle and to poultry farms that obviously could not have cattle contact. > > I was agitating the USDA that dairy workers were taking the virus to > poultry farms before I retired in May.  The USDA verified that this was > the case by June, but still did nothing to try to prevent further > poultry flock infections. > > Back in June the USDA and CDC understood that dairy workers were taking > the virus to other dairies and poultry farms, but never started testing > all the dairies, nor testing dairy workers. > > California confirmed this mode of spread by their contact tracing, and > they still did not do what should have been done.  Instead of > quarantining dairy workers to one farm they allowed voluntary > restrictions that obviously did not work. > > 3 infected poultry workers migrated from Washington to Oregon and were > identified, confirmed to be infected, and sent back to Washington, but > infected workers have been going to other states from the start of the > infection.  There has been no restrictions on their movements because > the USDA and CDC refuse to identify all the infected herds, nor test the > workers, so they don't even know which workers have to have their > movements restricted. > > Ron Okimoto https://www.the-independent.com/news/health/california-cows-bird-flu-virus-b2671647.html https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/avian-influenza-bird-flu/more-avian-flu-confirmed-us-dairy-cattle-and-poultry-flocks-arizona 71% of the dairy herds in California have been infected by the dairy virus. Over 16 million birds have had to be killed due to infected poultry ========== REMAINDER OF ARTICLE TRUNCATED ==========