Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connectionsPath: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.quux.org!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Richard Damon Newsgroups: comp.theory Subject: Re: Incorrect requirements --- Computing the mapping from the input to HHH(DD) Date: Fri, 9 May 2025 22:32:17 -0400 Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org) Message-ID: <7ae0bd991a1b0b6e509c81203e403abf6d7d98e7@i2pn2.org> References: <87msbmeo3b.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <87a57mek8r.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <87seled0zy.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <87zffmbeyt.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Sat, 10 May 2025 02:35:39 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="3883114"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="diqKR1lalukngNWEqoq9/uFtbkm5U+w3w6FQ0yesrXg"; User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: On 5/9/25 9:29 PM, olcott wrote: > On 5/9/2025 8:15 PM, Richard Heathfield wrote: >> On 10/05/2025 01:51, olcott wrote: >>> On 5/9/2025 7:29 PM, Richard Heathfield wrote: >>>> On 10/05/2025 00:02, olcott wrote: >>>>> Correctly emulating one or more instructions >>>>> the correct emulation of 1 or more instructions >>>>> of DD. This is a truism. >>>> >>>> No, it's not. Correct emulation would entail accurately simulating >>>> the whole of DDD's behaviour. >>> >>> It is stupidly wrong to require the complete >>> emulation of a non-terminating input. >> >> It is touchingly naive to think you can persuade people to accept >> incomplete emulation as 'correct'. >> > > If one instruction is emulated correctly > then is is dishonest to say that zero > instructions were emulated correctly. > But no one is saying that zero instruction were emulated correctly, the claim is that not-all instrucitons were emulated correctly. You are just showing you ignorance of how the logic of qualifiers work. "Correct Emulation" is the correct emulation of *ALL* the instructions. What you are trying to talk about is a correct PARTIAL emulation, which is something different, and doesn't prove your point. Sorry, you are just proving your ignorance.