Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: How do simulating termination analyzers work? ---Truth Maker
 Maximalism FULL_TRACE
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2025 09:30:36 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 24
Message-ID: <104oiqc$t0u4$6@dont-email.me>
References: <102sjg5$2k3e9$1@dont-email.me> <1047vld$n4s2$1@dont-email.me>
 <1048hp0$qd4f$2@dont-email.me>
 <66c00d5703907e846f537310dfb201485e1b7b2a@i2pn2.org>
 <10492eb$u8g5$1@dont-email.me> <104b5l9$fnl$1@news.muc.de>
 <104ben3$1hqln$1@dont-email.me> <104bt5h$1l1g$1@news.muc.de>
 <104bunk$1kcb5$1@dont-email.me> <104did7$hlh$1@news.muc.de>
 <104e164$2852a$1@dont-email.me> <104e6nd$12ua$1@news.muc.de>
 <104e93k$29rpg$1@dont-email.me> <104ed4k$223c$1@news.muc.de>
 <104ehua$2c91h$1@dont-email.me> <104epfu$nqi$1@news.muc.de>
 <104fdma$2n8gq$1@dont-email.me> <104fu68$rafj$3@dont-email.me>
 <104h4a5$324da$2@dont-email.me> <104ikfo$v7he$2@dont-email.me>
 <104jbvk$3jrpl$8@dont-email.me> <104lagd$13hr1$1@dont-email.me>
 <104lopg$7l4q$5@dont-email.me> <104o7u2$18h8g$4@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2025 16:30:37 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="5e1c5002647e5c8eaded405aea18dbaf";
	logging-data="951236"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18eoPsrjkSOA3ggF1r2Fzad"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:eeNMlxr0ya8AbuoeEXJxLdlf4s4=
X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 250710-4, 7/10/2025), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <104o7u2$18h8g$4@dont-email.me>

On 7/10/2025 6:24 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
> Op 09.jul.2025 om 14:54 schreef olcott:>>
>> One of these "errors" was that HHH cannot simulate itself at all.
> 
> As usual you twist the words of your reviewers.
> The claim was that no HHH can simulate itself correctly *up to the end*.
> 
>> https://liarparadox.org/HHH(DDD)_Full_Trace.pdf
>> Is the full execution trace of
>>
>> executed HHH simulates DDD that calls emulated HHH(DDD)
>> that simulates DDD that calls emulated emulated HHH(DDD)
> 
> And it also proves my claim that HHH did not simulate itself correctly 
> *up to the end*.
> 

Exactly what is your professional programming experience?
I have 20 years in C++ and became a professional programmer
in 1986.

-- 
Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer