Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: First, prove that DDD is correctly emulated by HHH
Date: Sat, 10 May 2025 02:31:14 +0100
Organization: Fix this later
Lines: 30
Message-ID: <vvma92$34h6f$4@dont-email.me>
References: <vvma0u$34vcu$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 10 May 2025 03:31:14 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="43b083a872fadb3f2c7703b3081889c2";
	logging-data="3294415"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19WEAnzbTgdA3LVkQkLTWKaRrAqoV6SAmcUWEXc54VVvQ=="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:TFqIfrqoyC0tjXBsSr2p0Xcn42o=
Content-Language: en-GB
In-Reply-To: <vvma0u$34vcu$1@dont-email.me>

On 10/05/2025 02:26, olcott wrote:
> void DDD()
> {
>    HHH(DDD);
>    return;
> }
> 
> _DDD()
> [00002172] 55         push ebp      ; housekeeping
> [00002173] 8bec       mov ebp,esp   ; housekeeping
> [00002175] 6872210000 push 00002172 ; push DDD
> [0000217a] e853f4ffff call 000015d2 ; call HHH(DDD)
> [0000217f] 83c404     add esp,+04
> [00002182] 5d         pop ebp
> [00002183] c3         ret
> Size in bytes:(0018) [00002183]
> 
> Try to show how DDD emulated by HHH according to the
> rules of the x86 language reaches its own "ret"
> instruction final halt state.

First, try to find a way to prove that DDD is correctly emulated 
by HHH. Proof by assertion will not do.

-- 
Richard Heathfield
Email: rjh at cpax dot org dot uk
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999
Sig line 4 vacant - apply within