Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Flibble=E2=80=99s_Leap=3A_Why_Behavioral_Divergence?=
 =?UTF-8?Q?_Implies_a_Type_Distinction_in_the_Halting_Problem?=
Date: Sun, 11 May 2025 22:34:22 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 41
Message-ID: <vvrmnd$s0mk$3@dont-email.me>
References: <vv1UP.77894$JJT6.54808@fx16.ams4> <vvqd4u$g8a1$1@dont-email.me>
 <7N2UP.527443$wBt6.464256@fx15.ams4> <vvqfgq$gmmk$1@dont-email.me>
 <os3UP.670056$BFJ.223954@fx13.ams4> <vvqgpt$gmmk$4@dont-email.me>
 <aG3UP.366972$wBVe.321504@fx06.ams4>
 <39947848bf73be52ee6fbbeb6d0d929009dfec8e@i2pn2.org>
 <fR8UP.92502$o31.50010@fx04.ams4>
 <fb3915123ad5c4703b92df902c37267fce2c4812@i2pn2.org>
 <vvrhk6$nejb$2@dont-email.me> <vvrhtj$nnmf$1@dont-email.me>
 <vvrj7l$nt1l$1@dont-email.me> <vvrl0v$o2ab$5@dont-email.me>
 <vvrm34$nejb$4@dont-email.me> <vvrmh3$sas2$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 12 May 2025 04:34:22 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="d587ba6f088c47ed8fd2ad250ebfd646";
	logging-data="918228"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/La4z41hS4NK6Q2RvOfLFl"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:vhzc47a1TJQSaNKbCL2Apb4vQCI=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <vvrmh3$sas2$1@dont-email.me>

On 5/11/2025 10:30 PM, olcott wrote:
> On 5/11/2025 9:23 PM, Richard Heathfield wrote:
>> On 12/05/2025 03:05, olcott wrote:
>>> On 5/11/2025 8:34 PM, Richard Heathfield wrote:
>>>> On 12/05/2025 02:12, olcott wrote:
>>>>
>>>> <snip>
>>>>
>>>>> No one here is using any actual reasoning
>>>>> in their rebuttals of my work.
>>>>
>>>> I have already shown several places where your 'work' violates the 
>>>> rules of its implementation's language standard, 
>>>
>>> My compiler disagrees so I can't fix that.
>>
>> C compilers are obliged to diagnose syntax errors. If they don't, 
>> they're not-quite-C compilers. You need to decide whether you're 
>> writing in C or whether you're not.
>>
> 
> 
> _DDD()
> [00002172] 55         push ebp      ; housekeeping
> [00002173] 8bec       mov  ebp,esp  ; housekeeping
> [00002175] 6872210000 push 00002172 ; push DDD
> [0000217a] e853f4ffff call 000015d2 ; call HHH(DDD)
> [0000217f] 83c404     add  esp,+04
> [00002182] 5d         pop  ebp
> [00002183] c3         ret
> Size in bytes:(0018) [00002183]
> 
> When testing the proof-of-concept not one line
> of my code is relevant. The only thing that needs
> be determined is the behavior of DDD under some
> HHH 

Category error.  Algorithm DDD isn't fully defined until algorithm HHH 
is fully defined.

So yes the code is relevant.