Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Frank Krygowski Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech Subject: Re: Job Offer Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2025 23:38:44 -0400 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 16 Message-ID: References: <0hg1ujt6gnpaoq2lstq835cum60723v6gj@4ax.com> Reply-To: frkrygow@gmail.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2025 04:38:46 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="8afbef9f4963d7d720ce11c07797bc48"; logging-data="4097709"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+W1fWXe5wRzBAs09P7qSRbb1VF7PdXBLA=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:CKxRlAxhgbZZnpX5xtIxWI0aoOA= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <0hg1ujt6gnpaoq2lstq835cum60723v6gj@4ax.com> On 3/23/2025 10:36 PM, Jeff Liebermann wrote: > > When it was changed back to Fort Bragg, it was not to honor > Confederate general Braxton Bragg. Instead, it was renamed in honor > of World War II paratrooper Roland L. Bragg. > > > "... the change to Fort Liberty was calculated to cost the Department > of Defense $6,374,230, making it the most expensive name change." > I couldn't find a price tag for the cost of changing it back. I'd bet they searched for a long time to find a Bragg to stand in for Braxton, in a "yeah, right" manner. -- - Frank Krygowski